This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M1118v1 10/1/69    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ammenwerth, E. Articles by Eichstädter, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ammenwerth, E. Articles by Eichstädter, R.

Factors Affecting and Affected by User Acceptance of Computer-based Nursing Documentation: Results of a Two-year Study

Affiliations of the authors: University for Health Informatics and Technology Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria (EA); Department of Medical Biometry, University Hospitals of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (UM); Institute for Educational Science, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (CI); Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (RE).

Correspondence and reprints: Elske Ammenwerth, PhD, University for Health Informatics and Technology Tyrol (UMIT), Innrain 98, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; e-mail: <elske.ammenwerth{at}umit.at>.

Objectives: The documentation of the nursing process is an important but often neglected part of clinical documentation. Paper-based systems have been introduced to support nursing process documentation. Frequently, however, problems such as low quality of documentation are reported. It is unclear whether computer-based documentation systems can reduce these problems and which factors influence their acceptance by users.

Design: We introduced a computer-based nursing documentation system on four wards of the University Hospitals of Heidelberg and systematically evaluated its preconditions and its effects in a pretest–posttest intervention study. For the analysis of user acceptance, we concentrated on subjective data drawn from questionnaires and interviews.

Measurements: A questionnaire was developed using items from published questionnaires and items that had to be developed for the special purpose of this study.

Results: The quantitative results point to two factors influencing the acceptance of a new computer-based documentation system: the previous acceptance of the nursing process and the previous amount of self-confidence when using computers. On one ward, the diverse acceptance scores heavily declined after the introduction of the nursing documentation system. Explorative qualitative analysis on this ward points to further success factors of computer-based nursing documentation systems.

Conclusion: Our results can be used to assist the planning and introduction of computer-based nursing documentation systems. They demonstrate the importance of computer experience and acceptance of the nursing process on a ward but also point to other factors such as the fit between nursing workflow and the functionality of a nursing documentation system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-T. Lium, H. Laerum, T. Schulz, and A. Faxvaag From the Front Line, Report from a Near Paperless Hospital: Mixed Reception Among Health Care Professionals J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 668 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Poissant, J. Pereira, R. Tamblyn, and Y. Kawasumi The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 505 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Urquhart and R. Currell Reviewing the evidence on nursing record systems Health Informatics Journal, March 1, 2005; 11(1): 33 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]