help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published August 4, 2003 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1305
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1305v1
10/6/515    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maojo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Kulikowski, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maojo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Kulikowski, C. A.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:515-522. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M1305.
© 2003 American Medical Informatics Association


Viewpoint Paper

Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics: Collaborations on the Road to Genomic Medicine?

Victor Maojo, MD, PhD and Casimir A. Kulikowski, PhD

Affiliations of the authors: Medical Informatics Group, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain (VM); Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey (CAK) USA

Correspondence and reprints: Victor Maojo, MD, PhD, Director, Medical Informatics Group, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Computer Science, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain; e-mail: <vmaojo{at}fi.upm.es>.

Received for publication: 12/06/02; accepted for publication: 01/29/03.

In this report, the authors compare and contrast medical informatics (MI) and bioinformatics (BI) and provide a viewpoint on their complementarities and potential for collaboration in various subfields. The authors compare MI and BI along several dimensions, including: (1) historical development of the disciplines, (2) their scientific foundations, (3) data quality and analysis, (4) integration of knowledge and databases, (5) informatics tools to support practice, (6) informatics methods to support research (signal processing, imaging and vision, and computational modeling, (7) professional and patient continuing education, and (8) education and training. It is pointed out that, while the two disciplines differ in their histories, scientific foundations, and methodologic approaches to research in various areas, they nevertheless share methods and tools, which provides a basis for exchange of experience in their different applications. MI expertise in developing health care applications and the strength of BI in biological "discovery science" complement each other well. The new field of biomedical informatics (BMI) holds great promise for developing informatics methods that will be crucial in the development of genomic medicine. The future of BMI will be influenced strongly by whether significant advances in clinical practice and biomedical research come about from separate efforts in MI and BI, or from emerging, hybrid informatics subdisciplines at their interface.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
E. M. van Mulligen, M. Cases, K. Hettne, E. Molero, M. Weeber, K. A. Robertson, B. Oliva, G. de la Calle, and V. Maojo
Training Multidisciplinary Biomedical Informatics Students: Three Years of Experience
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2008; 15(2): 246 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Medical Informatics Association.