help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published December 7, 2003 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1385
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1385v1
11/2/113    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westbrook, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Coiera, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westbrook, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Coiera, E.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:113-120. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M1385.
© 2004 American Medical Informatics Association


Research Paper

Do Clinicians Use Online Evidence to Support Patient Care? A Study of 55,000 Clinicians

Johanna I. Westbrook, PhD, A. Sophie Gosling, PsychD and Enrico Coiera, MBBS, PhD

Affiliation of the authors: Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia

Correspondence and reprints: Johanna I. Westbrook, PhD, Centre for Health Informatics, Level 2, Samuels Building, University of New South Wales, Kensington, 2052, Australia; e-mail: <j.westbrook{at}unsw.edu.au>.

Received for publication: 04/23/03; accepted for publication: 10/02/03.

Objectives: To determine clinicians' (doctors', nurses', and allied health professionals') "actual" and "reported" use of a point-of-care online information retrieval system; and to make an assessment of the extent to which use is related to direct patient care by testing two hypotheses: hypothesis 1: clinicians use online evidence primarily to support clinical decisions relating to direct patient care; and hypothesis 2: clinicians use online evidence predominantly for research and continuing education.

Design: Web-log analysis of the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), an online, 24-hour, point-of-care information retrieval system available to 55,000 clinicians in public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. A statewide mail survey of 5,511 clinicians.

Measurements: Rates of online evidence searching per 100 clinicians for the state and for the 81 individual hospitals studied; reported use of CIAP by clinicians through a self-administered questionnaire; and correlations between evidence searches and patient admissions.

Results: Monthly rates of 48.5 "search sessions" per 100 clinicians and 231.6 text hits to single-source databases per 100 clinicians (n = 619,545); 63% of clinicians reported that they were aware of CIAP and 75% of those had used it. Eighty-eight percent of users reported CIAP had the potential to improve patient care and 41% reported direct experience of this. Clinicians' use of CIAP on each day of the week was highly positively correlated with patient admissions (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). This was also true for all ten randomly selected hospitals.

Conclusion: Clinicians' online evidence use increases with patient admissions, supporting the hypothesis that clinicians' use of evidence is related to direct patient care. Patterns of evidence use and clinicians' self-reports also support this hypothesis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
E. Coiera, J. I. Westbrook, and K. Rogers
Clinical Decision Velocity is Increased when Meta-search Filters Enhance an Evidence Retrieval System
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2008; 15(5): 638 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
P. Pluye, R. M. Grad, N. Mysore, L. Knaapen, J. Johnson-Lafleur, and M. Dawes
Systematically Assessing the Situational Relevance of Electronic Knowledge Resources: A Mixed Methods Study
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 616 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
K. A. McKibbon, N. L. Wilczynski, and R. B. Haynes
Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Retrieving Qualitative Studies in PsycINFO.
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2006; 29(4): 440 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Informatics JournalHome page
A. Roy, P. Kostkova, M. Catchpole, and E. Carson
Web-based provision of information on infectious diseases: a systems study.
Health Informatics Journal, December 1, 2006; 12(4): 274 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
N. Liu, L. Marenco, and P. L. Miller
ResourceLog: An Embeddable Tool for Dynamically Monitoring the Usage of Web-Based Bioscience Resources
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2006; 13(4): 432 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
N. L. Wilczynski and R. B. Haynes
Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Prognostic Studies in EMBASE: An Analytic Survey
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 481 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. I. Westbrook, E. W. Coiera, and A. S. Gosling
Do Online Information Retrieval Systems Help Experienced Clinicians Answer Clinical Questions?
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 315 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. I. Westbrook, A. S. Gosling, and E. W. Coiera
The Impact of an Online Evidence System on Confidence in Decision Making in a Controlled Setting
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 178 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Medical Informatics Association.