This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M1372v1 11/3/207    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aarts, J. Articles by Berg, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aarts, J. Articles by Berg, M.

Understanding Implementation: The Case of a Computerized Physician Order Entry System in a Large Dutch University Medical Center

Affiliations of the authors: Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (JA, MB); Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (HD).

Correspondence and reprints: Jos Aarts, MSc, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; e-mail: <j.aarts{at}bmg.eur.nl>.

Received for publication: 03/27/03; accepted for publication: 11/24/03.

Most studies of the impact of information systems in organizations tend to see the implementation process as a "rollout" of technology, as a technical matter removed from organizational dynamics. There is substantial agreement that the success of implementing information systems is determined by organizational factors. However, it is less clear what these factors are. The authors propose to characterize the introduction of an information system as a process of mutual shaping. As a result, both the technology and the practice supported by the technology are transformed, and specific technical and social outcomes gradually emerge. The authors suggest that insights from social studies of science and technology can help to understand an implementation process. Focusing on three theoretical aspects, the authors argue first that the implementation process should be understood as a thoroughly social process in which both technology and practice are transformed. Second, following Orlikowski's concept of "emergent change," they suggest that implementing a system is, by its very nature, unpredictable. Third, they argue that success and failure are not dichotomous and static categories, but socially negotiated judgments. Using these insights, the authors have analyzed the implementation of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system in a large Dutch university medical center. During the course of this study, the full implementation of CPOE was halted, but the aborted implementation exposed issues on which the authors did not initially focus.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. M. Lorenzi, L. L. Novak, J. B. Weiss, C. S. Gadd, and K. M. Unertl Crossing the Implementation Chasm: A Proposal for Bold Action J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 290 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Callen, J. Braithwaite, and J. I. Westbrook Contextual Implementation Model: A Framework for Assisting Clinical Information System Implementations J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2008; 15(2): 255 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Vogelsmeier, J. R.B. Halbesleben, and J. R. Scott-Cawiezell Technology Implementation and Workarounds in the Nursing Home J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 114 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Harrison, R. Koppel, and S. Bar-Lev Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 542 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Schulman, G. J. Kuperman, A. Kharbanda, and R. Kaushal Discovering How to Think about a Hospital Patient Information System by Struggling to Evaluate It: A Committee's Journal J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 537 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Weir, B. L. Hicken, H. Rappaport, and J. R. Nebeker Crossing the Quality Chasm: The Role of Information Technology Departments. American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2006; 21(6): 382 - 393. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-T. Lium, H. Laerum, T. Schulz, and A. Faxvaag From the Front Line, Report from a Near Paperless Hospital: Mixed Reception Among Health Care Professionals J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 668 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Callen, J. I. Westbrook, and J. Braithwaite The Effect of Physicians' Long-term Use of CPOE on Their Test Management Work Practices J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 643 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Chaudhry, J. Wang, S. Wu, M. Maglione, W. Mojica, E. Roth, S. C. Morton, and P. G. Shekelle Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care Ann Intern Med, May 16, 2006; 144(10): 742 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Gesteland, J. R. Nebeker, and R. M. Gardner These Are the Technologies That Try Men's Souls: Common-Sense Health Information Technology Pediatrics, January 1, 2006; 117(1): 216 - 217. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J T. Scott, T. G Rundall, T. M Vogt, and J. Hsu Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study BMJ, December 3, 2005; 331(7528): 1313 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Y. Han, J. A. Carcillo, S. T. Venkataraman, R. S.B. Clark, R. S. Watson, T. C. Nguyen, H. Bayir, and R. A. Orr Unexpected Increased Mortality After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry System Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1506 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Wears and M. Berg Computer Technology and Clinical Work: Still Waiting for Godot JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1261 - 1263. [Full Text] [PDF]