This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M1535v1 11/6/448    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chang, B. L. Articles by Stavri, P. Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chang, B. L. Articles by Stavri, P. Z.

Bridging the Digital Divide: Reaching Vulnerable Populations

Affiliations of the authors: University of California-Los Angeles, CA (BLC); Columbia University, New York, NY (SB, RK); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (SSB); University of Alabama-Birmingham, AL (TKH); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (GLK); Clinician Support Technology, Newton, MA & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (CS); Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (PZS).

Correspondence and reprints: Suzanne Bakken, RN, DNSc, Columbia University School of Nursing, Mailbox 6, New York, NY 10032; e-mail: <suzanne.bakken{at}dbmi.columbia.edu>.

Received for publication: 01/12/04; accepted for publication: 06/30/04.

The AMIA 2003 Spring Congress entitled "Bridging the Digital Divide: Informatics and Vulnerable Populations" convened 178 experts including medical informaticians, health care professionals, government leaders, policy makers, researchers, health care industry leaders, consumer advocates, and others specializing in health care provision to underserved populations. The primary objective of this working congress was to develop a framework for a national agenda in information and communication technology to enhance the health and health care of underserved populations. Discussions during four tracks addressed issues and trends in information and communication technologies for underserved populations, strategies learned from successful programs, evaluation methodologies for measuring the impact of informatics, and dissemination of information for replication of successful programs. Each track addressed current status, ideal state, barriers, strategies, and recommendations. Recommendations of the breakout sessions were summarized under the overarching themes of Policy, Funding, Research, and Education and Training. The general recommendations emphasized four key themes: revision in payment and reimbursement policies, integration of health care standards, partnerships as the key to success, and broad dissemination of findings including specific feedback to target populations and other key stakeholders.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Bath Health informatics: current issues and challenges Journal of Information Science, August 1, 2008; 34(4): 501 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. L. Kreps Communication and Racial Inequities in Health Care American Behavioral Scientist, February 1, 2006; 49(6): 760 - 774. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Harris, L. Lane, and I. Biaggioni Clinical Research Subject Recruitment: The Volunteer for Vanderbilt Research Program www.volunteer.mc.vanderbilt.edu J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2005; 12(6): 608 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Sax, I. Kohane, and K. D. Mandl Wireless Technology Infrastructures for Authentication of Patients: PKI that Rings J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]