| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Viewpoint Paper |
Affiliations of the authors: Indiana University School of Medicine and the Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN (JMO); eHealth Initiative and Foundation, Washington, DC (LE, JM).
Correspondence and reprints: J. Marc Overhage, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2872; e-mail: <moverhage{at}regenstrief.org>.
Received for publication: 08/19/04; accepted for publication: 11/17/04.
Background: The Secretary of Health and Human Services recently released a report calling for the nation to create a national health information network (NHIN) that would interconnect Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs). These RHIOs, which others have called Local or Regional Health Information Infrastructures (LHII), would in turn interconnect local as well as national health information resources. Little data exist about the activities taking place in communities to create LHIIs.
Approach: The authors analyzed data that communities submitted in response to a request for capabilities issued by the Foundation for eHealth as part of their Connecting Communities for Better Health program using descriptive statistics and subjective evaluation.
Impression: The authors analyzed data from 134 responses from communities in 42 states and the District of Columbia. Communities are enthusiastic about moving forward with health information exchange to create LHIIs to improve the efficiency, quality, and safety of care. They have identified significant local sources of investment and plan to use some clinical data standards but not as broadly as was expected. The communities have not yet developed the specific technical approaches or the sustainable business models that will be required. Many communities are interested in creating an LHII and are developing the leadership commitment needed to translate that interest into an operational reality. Clinical information standards can be incorporated into a community's plans as often as they need to be. Communities have to overcome funding issues, develop deeper understanding of the technical and organizational issues, and aggressively share their learning to succeed within their community and to help other communities succeed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  O. Bouhaddou, P. Warnekar, F. Parrish, N. Do, J. Mandel, J. Kilbourne, and M. J. Lincoln Exchange of Computable Patient Data between the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense (DoD): Terminology Mediation Strategy J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2008; 15(2): 174 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. McMurry, C. A. Gilbert, B. Y. Reis, H. C. Chueh, I. S. Kohane, and K. D. Mandl A Self-scaling, Distributed Information Architecture for Public Health, Research, and Clinical Care J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 527 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Grossman, T. S. Bodenheimer, and K. McKenzie Hospital-Physician Portals: The Role Of Competition In Driving Clinical Data Exchange Health Aff., November 1, 2006; 25(6): 1629 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Halamka, M. Aranow, C. Ascenzo, D. Bates, G. Debor, J. Glaser, A. Goroll, J. Stowe, M. Tripathi, and G. Vineyard Health Care IT Collaboration in Massachusetts: The Experience of Creating Regional Connectivity J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2005; 12(6): 596 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Halamka, J. M. Overhage, L. Ricciardi, W. Rishel, C. Shirky, and C. Diamond Exchanging Health Information: Local Distribution, National Coordination Health Aff., September 1, 2005; 24(5): 1170 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
