| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Paper |
Affiliations of the authors: Division of Health Services Management and Policy, School of Public Health, The Ohio State University (ASM, SBS); Departments of Pediatrics (ASM) and General Internal Medicine (MAM), College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Correspondence and reprints: Ann Scheck McAlearney, ScD, MS, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University, 1583 Perry Street, Atwell 246, Columbus, OH 43210-1234; e-mail: <mcalearney.1{at}osu.edu>.
Received for publication: 02/24/05; accepted for publication: 05/12/05.
Objective: To describe strategies that organizations select to support physicians' use of handheld computers (HHCs) in clinical practice and to explore issues about facilitating HHC use.
Design: A multidisciplinary team used focus groups and interviews with clinical, administrative, and information technology (IT) staff to gather data from 161 informants at seven sites. Transcripts were coded using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches to both answer research questions and identify patterns and themes that emerged in the data.
Measurements: Answers to questions about strategies for HHC support and themes about (1) how to facilitate physician adoption and use and (2) organizational concerns.
Results: Three main organizational strategies for HHC support were characterized among sites: (1) active support for broad-based use, (2) active support for niche use, and (3) basic support for individual physician users. Three high-level themes emerged around how to best facilitate physician adoption and use of HHCs: (1) improving usability and usefulness, (2) promoting HHCs and device use, and (3) providing training and support. However, four major themes also emerged related to organizations' concerns about HHC use: (1) security-related concerns, (2) economic concerns, (3) technical concerns, and (4) strategic concerns.
Conclusion: An organizational approach to HHC support that involves individualized attention to existing and potential physician users rather than one-size-fits-all, organization-wide implementation efforts was an important facilitator promoting physician use of HHCs. Health care organizations interested in supporting HHC use must consider issues related to security, economics, and IT strategy that may not be prominent concerns for physician users.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  N. J. Bosomworth Medical palmistry: Creating hyperlinked documents for the small screen Can Fam Physician, July 1, 2008; 54(7): 986 - 987. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Yu, T. K. Houston, M. N. Ray, D. Q. Garner, and E. S. Berner Patterns of Use of Handheld Clinical Decision Support Tools in the Clinical Setting Med Decis Making, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 744 - 753. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Hauser, D. Demner-Fushman, J. L. Jacobs, S. M. Humphrey, G. Ford, and G. R. Thoma Using Wireless Handheld Computers to Seek Information at the Point of Care: An Evaluation by Clinicians J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 807 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Rothschild, E. Fang, V. Liu, I. Litvak, C. Yoon, and D. W. Bates Use and Perceived Benefits of Handheld Computer-based Clinical References J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 619 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
