help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published December 15, 2005 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1908
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1908v1
13/2/180    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Resnic, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Resnic, F. S.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:180-187. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M1908.
© 2006 American Medical Informatics Association


Research Paper

Monitoring Device Safety in Interventional Cardiology

Michael E. Matheny, MD, Lucila Ohno-Machado, MD, PhD and Frederic S. Resnic, MD, MS

Affiliations of the authors: Decision Systems Group, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (MEM, LOM, FSR), Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (MEM, LOM, FSR).

Correspondence and reprints: Frederic S. Resnic, MD, MS, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: <mmatheny{at}dsg.harvard.edu>, Michael E. Matheny, MD; e-mail: <fresnic{at}partners.org>.

Received for publication: 07/07/05; accepted for publication: 10/16/05.

Objective: A variety of postmarketing surveillance strategies to monitor the safety of medical devices have been supported by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but there are few systems to automate surveillance. Our objective was to develop a system to perform real-time monitoring of safety data using a variety of process control techniques.

Design: The Web-based Data Extraction and Longitudinal Time Analysis (DELTA) system imports clinical data in real-time from an electronic database and generates alerts for potentially unsafe devices or procedures. The statistical techniques used are statistical process control (SPC), logistic regression (LR), and Bayesian updating statistics (BUS).

Measurements: We selected in-patient mortality following implantation of the Cypher drug-eluting coronary stent to evaluate our system. Data from the University of Michigan Consortium Bare-Metal Stent Study was used to calculate the event rate alerting boundaries. Data analysis was performed on local catheterization data from Brigham and Women's Hospital from July 1, 2003, shortly after the Cypher release, to December 31, 2004, including 2,270 cases with 27 observed deaths.

Results: The single-stratum SPC had alerts in months 4 and 10. The multistrata SPC had alerts in months 5, 10, and 18 in the moderate-risk stratum, and months 1, 4, 7, and 10 in the high-risk stratum. The only cumulative alerts were in the first month for the high-risk stratum of the multistrata SPC. The LR method showed no monthly or cumulative alerts. The BUS method showed an alert in the first month for the high-risk stratum.

Conclusion: The system performed adequately within the Brigham and Women's Hospital Intranet environment based on the design goals. All three cumulative methods agreed that the overall observed event rates were not significantly higher for the new medical device than for a closely related medical device and were consistent with the observation that the initial concerns about this device dissipated as more data accumulated.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Medical Informatics Association.