This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Appendix All Versions of this Article: M2093v1 13/5/536    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Richesson, R. L. Articles by Krischer, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Richesson, R. L. Articles by Krischer, J. P.

Use of SNOMED CT to Represent Clinical Research Data: A Semantic Characterization of Data Items on Case Report Forms in Vasculitis Research

^a Pediatrics Epidemiology Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
^b School of Library and Information Science, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

^_* Correspondence and reprints: Rachel L. Richesson, PhD, MPH, Pediatrics Epidemiology Center, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 3650 Spectrum Blvd., Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33612. (Email: Rachel.Richesson{at}epi.usf.edu).

Received for publication: 03/02/06; accepted for publication: 06/12/06.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the coverage provided by SNOMED CT for clinical research concepts represented by the items on case report forms (CRFs), as well as the semantic nature of those concepts relevant to post-coordination methods.

DESIGN: Convenience samples from CRFs developed by rheumatologists conducting several longitudinal, observational studies of vasculitis were selected. A total of 17 CRFs were used as the basis of analysis for this study, from which a total set of 616 (unique) items were identified. Each unique data item was classified as either a clinical finding or procedure. The items were coded by the presence and nature of SNOMED CT coverage and classified into semantic types by 2 coders.

MEASUREMENTS: Basic frequency analysis was conducted to determine levels of coverage provided by SNOMED CT. Estimates of coverage by various semantic characterizations were estimated.

RESULTS: Most of the core clinical concepts (88%) from these clinical research data items were covered by SNOMED CT; however, far fewer of the concepts were fully covered (that is, where all aspects of the CRF item could be represented completely without post-coordination; 23%). In addition, a large majority of the concepts (83%) required post-coordination, either to clarify context (e.g., time) or to better capture complex clinical concepts (e.g., disease-related findings). For just over one third of the sampled CRF data items, both types of post-coordination were necessary to fully represent the meaning of the item.

CONCLUSION: SNOMED CT appears well-suited for representing a variety of clinical concepts, yet is less suited for representing the full amount of information collected on CRFs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Richesson and J. Krischer Data Standards in Clinical Research: Gaps, Overlaps, Challenges and Future Directions J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 687 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Andrews, R. L. Richesson, and J. Krischer Variation of SNOMED CT Coding of Clinical Research Concepts among Coding Experts J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 497 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]