This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M2198v1 14/1/10    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tang, P. C. Articles by Graham, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tang, P. C. Articles by Graham, J.

Comparison of Methodologies for Calculating Quality Measures Based on Administrative Data versus Clinical Data from an Electronic Health Record System: Implications for Performance Measures

^a Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA
^b Lumetra, San Francisco, CA

^_* Correspondence and reprints: Paul C. Tang, MD, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94301; Tel: (650) 853-5775; Fax: (650) 853-6050. (Email: pctang{at}pacbell.net).

Received for publication: 07/09/06; accepted for publication: 10/11/06.

New reimbursement policies and pay-for-performance programs to reward providers for producing better outcomes are proliferating. Although electronic health record (EHR) systems could provide essential clinical data upon which to base quality measures, most metrics in use were derived from administrative claims data. We compared commonly used quality measures calculated from administrative data to those derived from clinical data in an EHR based on a random sample of 125 charts of Medicare patients with diabetes. Using standard definitions based on administrative data (which require two visits with an encounter diagnosis of diabetes during the measurement period), only 75% of diabetics determined by manually reviewing the EHR (the gold standard) were identified. In contrast, 97% of diabetics were identified using coded information in the EHR.

The discrepancies in identified patients resulted in statistically significant differences in the quality measures for frequency of HbA1c testing, control of blood pressure, frequency of testing for urine protein, and frequency of eye exams for diabetic patients. New development of standardized quality measures should shift from claims-based measures to clinically based measures that can be derived from coded information in an EHR. Using data from EHRs will also leverage their clinical content without adding burden to the care process.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L Gunningberg, M F. Dahm, and A Ehrenberg Accuracy in the recording of pressure ulcers and prevention after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 281 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. V.S. Pakhomov, P. L. Hanson, S. S. Bjornsen, and S. A. Smith Automatic Classification of Foot Examination Findings Using Clinical Notes and Machine Learning J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2008; 15(2): 198 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]