help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published February 28, 2007 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2228
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2228v1
14/3/340    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Carley, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Carley, K.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:340-348. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2228.
© 2007 American Medical Informatics Association


Research paper

A Longitudinal Social Network Analysis of the Editorial Boards of Medical Informatics and Bioinformatics Journals

Bradley Malin, PhDa,* and Kathleen Carley, PhDb

a Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
b Institute for Software Research, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

* Correspondence and reprints: Bradley Malin, PhD, Eskind Biomedical Library, Fourth Floor, Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-8340 (Email: b.malin{at}vanderbilt.edu).

Received for publication: 07/28/06; accepted for publication: 01/29/07.

Objective: The goal of this research is to learn how the editorial staffs of bioinformatics and medical informatics journals provide support for cross-community exposure. Models such as co-citation and co-author analysis measure the relationships between researchers; but they do not capture how environments that support knowledge transfer across communities are organized.

Methods: In this paper, we propose a social network analysis model to study how editorial boards integrate researchers from disparate communities. We evaluate our model by building relational networks based on the editorial boards of approximately 40 journals that serve as research outlets in medical informatics and bioinformatics. We track the evolution of editorial relationships through a longitudinal investigation over the years 2000 through 2005.

Results: Our findings suggest that there are research journals that support the collocation of editorial board members from the bioinformatics and medical informatics communities. Network centrality metrics indicate that editorial board members are located in the intersection of the communities and that the number of individuals in the intersection is growing with time.

Conclusions: Social network analysis methods provide insight into the relationships between the medical informatics and bioinformatics communities. The number of editorial board members facilitating the publication intersection of the communities has grown, but the intersection remains dependent on a small group of individuals and fragile.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Medical Informatics Association.