| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Viewpoint Paper |
a Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
b University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
c Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.
* Correspondence and reprints: Michael I Harrison, PhD, Senior Research Scientist, Organizations and Systems, Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Rd., Rockville, MD 20850 (Email: Michael.Harrison{at}ahrq.hhs.gov).
Received for publication: 01/24/07; accepted for publication: 06/18/07.
Many unintended and undesired consequences of Healthcare Information Technologies (HIT) flow from interactions between the HIT and the healthcare organizations sociotechnical system—its workflows, culture, social interactions, and technologies. This paper develops and illustrates a conceptual model of these processes that we call Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis (ISTA). ISTA captures common types of interaction with special emphasis on recursive processes, i.e., feedback loops that alter the newly introduced HIT and promote second-level changes in the social system. ISTA draws on prior studies of unintended consequences, along with research in sociotechnical systems, ergonomics, social informatics, technology-in-practice, and social construction of technology. We present five types of sociotechnical interaction and illustrate each with cases from published research. The ISTA model should further research on emergent and recursive processes in HIT implementation and their unintended consequences. Familiarity with the model can also foster practitioners awareness of unanticipated consequences that only become evident during HIT implementation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Koppel, T. Wetterneck, J. L. Telles, and B.-T. Karsh Workarounds to Barcode Medication Administration Systems: Their Occurrences, Causes, and Threats to Patient Safety J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 408 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |