This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M2328v1 14/5/626    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dailey, L. Articles by Plant, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dailey, L. Articles by Plant, A. J.

Timeliness of Data Sources Used for Influenza Surveillance

Australian Biosecurity CRC for Emerging Infectious Disease, Division of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.

^_* Correspondence and reprints: Lynne Dailey, Australian Biosecurity CRC, Health Research Campus, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987 Perth, Western Australia 6845 (Email: lynne.dailey{at}postgrad.curtin.edu.au).

Received for publication: 11/13/06; accepted for publication: 05/20/07.

Objective: In recent years, influenza surveillance data has expanded to include alternative sources such as emergency department data, absenteeism reports, pharmaceutical sales, website access and health advice calls. This study presents a review of alternative data sources for influenza surveillance, summarizes the time advantage or timeliness of each source relative to traditional reporting and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of competing approaches.

Methods: A literature search was conducted on Medline to identify relevant articles published after 1990. A total of 15 articles were obtained that reported the timeliness of an influenza surveillance system. Timeliness was described by peak comparison, aberration detection comparison and correlation.

Results: Overall, the data sources were highly correlated with traditional sources and had variable timeliness. Over-the-counter pharmaceutical sales, emergency visits, absenteeism and health calls appear to be more timely than physician diagnoses, sentinel influenza-like-illness surveillance and virological confirmation.

Conclusions: The methods used to describe timeliness vary greatly between studies and hence no strong conclusions regarding the most timely source/s of data can be reached. Future studies should apply the aberration detection method to determine data source timeliness in preference to the peak comparison method and correlation.