help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published December 20, 2007 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2475
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2475v1
15/2/195    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korst, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fink, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korst, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fink, A.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:195-197. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2475.
© 2008 American Medical Informatics Association


Implementation Brief

Identifying Organizational Capacities and Incentives for Clinical Data-sharing: The Case of a Regional Perinatal Information System

Lisa M. Korst, MD, PhDa,b,*, Jordana M.K. Signer, PhDb, Carolyn E. Aydin, PhDc and Arlene Fink, PhDb

a Childbirth Research Associates, LLC Los Angeles, CA
b Langley Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA
c Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Burns & Allen Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA.

* Correspondence: Lisa M. Korst, MD, PhD, 12439 Magnolia Boulevard, #154, North Hollywood, CA 91607 (Email: korst{at}usc.edu).

Received for publication: 04/11/07; accepted for publication: 11/04/07.

The development of regional data-sharing among healthcare organizations is viewed as an important step in the development of health information technology (HIT), but little is known about this complex task. This is a case study of a regional perinatal data system that involved four hospitals, together responsible for over 10,000 births annually. Using standard qualitative methods, we chronicled project milestones, and identified 31 "critical incidents" that delayed or prevented their achievement. We then used these critical incidents to articulate six organizational capacity domains associated with the achievement of project milestones, and a seventh domain consisting of organizational incentives. Finally, we analyzed the relationship of milestone achievement to the presence of these capacities and incentives. This data center case suggests four requirements for sharing data across organizations: 1) a readiness assessment; 2) a perceived mandate; 3) a formal governance structure; and 4) a third party IT component.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Medical Informatics Association.