help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published August 28, 2008 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2547
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2547v1
15/6/729    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaelber, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaelber, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D. W.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:729-736. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2547.
© 2008 American Medical Informatics Association


Viewpoint Paper

A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs)

David C. Kaelber, MD, PhDa,b,c,d,e,*, Ashish K. Jha, MD, MPHd,e,f,g, Douglas Johnston, MTSa,b, Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSca,b,d,f,g and David W. Bates, MD, MSca,b,c,d,f,g

a Partners HealthCare Information Systems, Boston MA
b Center for Information Technology Leadership, Boston MA
c Center for Clinical and Quality Analysis, Boston MA
d The Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
e VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
f Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
g Department of Healthcare Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA

* Correspondence: David C. Kaelber, MD, PhD, 3158 Kingsley Road, Shaker Heights, Ohio, 44122 (Email: david.kaelber{at}case.edu).

Received for publication: 07/04/07; accepted for publication: 08/03/08.

Patients, policymakers, providers, payers, employers, and others have increasing interest in using personal health records (PHRs) to improve healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency. While organizations now invest millions of dollars in PHRs, the best PHR architectures, value propositions, and descriptions are not universally agreed upon. Despite widespread interest and activity, little PHR research has been done to date, and targeted research investment in PHRs appears inadequate. The authors reviewed the existing PHR specific literature (100 articles) and divided the articles into seven categories, of which four in particular—evaluation of PHR functions, adoption and attitudes of healthcare providers and patients towards PHRs, PHR related privacy and security, and PHR architecture—present important research opportunities. We also briefly discuss other research related to PHRs, PHR research funding sources, and PHR business models. We believe that additional PHR research can increase the likelihood that future PHR system deployments will beneficially impact healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Medical Informatics Association.