help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published August 28, 2008 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2717
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2717v1
15/6/780    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hripcsak, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hripcsak, G.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:780-782. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2717.
© 2008 American Medical Informatics Association


Case Report

Using Social Network Analysis within a Department of Biomedical Informatics to Induce a Discussion of Academic Communities of Practice

Jacqueline Merrill, RN, MPH, DNSc* and George Hripcsak, MD, MS

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, NY

* Correspondence: Dr. Jacqueline Merrill, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 622 West 168th Street, VC-5, New York, NY 10032 (Email: jacqueline.merrill{at}dbmi.columbia.edu).

Received for publication: 01/09/08; accepted for publication: 06/29/08.

In order to assess the mission and strategic direction in an academic department of biomedical informatics, we used social network analysis to identify patterns of common interest among the department's multidisciplinary faculty. Data representing faculty and their self-identified research methods and expertise were analyzed by applying a network modularity algorithm to detect community structure. Three distinct communities of practice emerged: empirical discovery and prediction; human and organizational factors; and information management. This analysis made intuitive sense and served the goal of stimulating discussion from new perspectives. The findings will guide future direction and faculty recruitment efforts. Communities of practice present a novel view of interdisciplinarity in biomedical informatics.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Medical Informatics Association.