This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M2950v1 16/1/109    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Uzuner, O. Articles by Sibanda, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Uzuner, O. Articles by Sibanda, T.

Machine Learning and Rule-based Approaches to Assertion Classification

^a Information Studies, State University of New York, Albany, NY
^b MIT CSAIL, Cambridge, MA
^c Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Northern Cyprus Campus, Kalkanli, Guzelyurt, Cyprus

^_* Correspondence: Özlem Uzuner Draper 114A, 135 Western Ave, Albany NY 12222 (Email: ouzuner{at}albany.edu).

Received for publication: 08/06/08; accepted for publication: 09/28/08.

Objectives: The authors study two approaches to assertion classification. One of these approaches, Extended NegEx (ENegEx), extends the rule-based NegEx algorithm to cover alter-association assertions; the other, Statistical Assertion Classifier (StAC), presents a machine learning solution to assertion classification.

Design: For each mention of each medical problem, both approaches determine whether the problem, as asserted by the context of that mention, is present, absent, or uncertain in the patient, or associated with someone other than the patient. The authors use these two systems to (1) extend negation and uncertainty extraction to recognition of alter-association assertions, (2) determine the contribution of lexical and syntactic context to assertion classification, and (3) test if a machine learning approach to assertion classification can be as generally applicable and useful as its rule-based counterparts.

Measurements: The authors evaluated assertion classification approaches with precision, recall, and F-measure.

Results: The ENegEx algorithm is a general algorithm that can be directly applied to new corpora. Despite being based on machine learning, StAC can also be applied out-of-the-box to new corpora and achieve similar generality.

Conclusion: The StAC models that are developed on discharge summaries can be successfully applied to radiology reports. These models benefit the most from words found in the ± 4 word window of the target and can outperform ENegEx.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Ohno-Machado and R. A. Miller Outstanding submissions to the AMIA annual symposium now featured in JAMIA. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2009; 16(1): 143 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF]