| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol 3, 224-233, Copyright © 1996 by American Medical Informatics Association
ARTICLES |
CG Chute, SP Cohn, KE Campbell, DE Oliver and JR Campbell
Section of Medical Information Resources, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. chute@mayo.edu
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient conditions and events are the core of patient record content. Computer-based records will require standard vocabularies to represent these data consistently, thereby facilitating clinical decision support, research, and efficient care delivery. To address whether existing major coding systems can serve this function, the authors evaluated major clinical classifications for their content coverage. METHODS: Clinical text from four medical centers was sampled from inpatient and outpatient settings. The resultant corpus of 14,247 words was parsed into 3,061 distinct concepts. These concepts were grouped into Diagnoses, Modifiers, Findings, Treatments and Procedures, and Other. Each concept was coded into ICD-9-CM, ICD-10, CPT, SNOMED III, Read V2, UMLS 1.3, and NANDA; a secondary reviewer ensured consistency. While coding, the information was scored: 0 = no match, 1 = fair match, 2 = complete match. RESULTS: ICD-9-CM had an overall mean score of 0.77 out of 2; its highest subscore was 1.61 for Diagnoses. ICD-10 scored 1.60 for Diagnoses, and 0.62 overall. The overall score of ICD-9-CM augmented by CPT was not materially improved at 0.82. The SNOMED International system demonstrated the highest score in every category, including Diagnoses (1.90), and had an overall score of 1.74. CONCLUSION: No classification captured all concepts, although SNOMED did notably the most complete job. The systems in major use in the United States, ICD-9-CM and CPT, fail to capture substantial clinical content. ICD-10 does not perform better than ICD-9-CM. The major clinical classifications in use today incompletely cover the clinical content of patient records; thus analytic conclusions that depend on these systems may be suspect.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. T. Rosenbloom, R. A. Miller, K. B. Johnson, P. L. Elkin, and S. H. Brown A Model for Evaluating Interface Terminologies J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 65 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Bales, Y. A. Lussier, and S. B. Johnson Topological Analysis of Large-scale Biomedical Terminology Structures J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 788 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Richesson, J. E. Andrews, and J. P. Krischer Use of SNOMED CT to Represent Clinical Research Data: A Semantic Characterization of Data Items on Case Report Forms in Vasculitis Research J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2006; 13(5): 536 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Rosenbloom, R. A. Miller, K. B. Johnson, P. L. Elkin, and S. H. Brown Interface Terminologies: Facilitating Direct Entry of Clinical Data into Electronic Health Record Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2006; 13(3): 277 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Jenders Classification of Psychiatric Disorders JAMA, October 19, 2005; 294(15): 1899 - 1899. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Rothschild and H. P. Lehmann Information Retrieval Performance of Probabilistically Generated, Problem-Specific Computerized Provider Order Entry Pick-Lists: A Pilot Study J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 322 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Shapiro, E. Chung, L. T. Detwiler, J. L.V. Mejino Jr., A. V. Agoncillo, J. F. Brinkley, and C. Rosse Processes and Problems in the Formative Evaluation of an Interface to the Foundational Model of Anatomy Knowledge Base J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 35 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K.L. SCHLEYER Should dentistry be part of the National Health Information Infrastructure? J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2004; 135(12): 1687 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J B Brown, V. Warmington, M. Laurence, and A T. Prevost Randomised crossover trial comparing the performance of Clinical Terms Version 3 and Read Codes 5 byte set coding schemes in general practice BMJ, May 22, 2003; 326(7399): 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Duclos-Cartolano and A. Venot Building and Evaluation of a Structured Representation of Pharmacokinetics Information Presented in SPCs: From Existing Conceptual Views of Pharmacokinetics Associated with Natural Language Processing to Object-oriented Design J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2003; 10(3): 271 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sistrom and W. Drane Networked ICD-9 Coding System for a Radiology Department Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 335 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stausberg, H. Lang, U. Obertacke, and F. Rauhut Classifications in Routine Use: Lessons from ICD-9 and ICPM in Surgical Practice J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2001; 8(1): 92 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Miller and H. Britt ICPC-2-E: The Electronic Version ICPC-2 Fam. Pract., October 1, 2000; 17(5): 448 - 448. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bakken, K. E. Campbell, J. J. Cimino, S. M. Huff, and W. E. Hammond Toward Vocabulary Domain Specifications for Health Level 7--coded Data Elements J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2000; 7(4): 333 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bakken, M. S. Cashen, E. A. Mendonca, A. O'Brien, and J. Zieniewicz Representing Nursing Activities within a Concept-oriented Terminological System: Evaluation of aType Definition J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2000; 7(1): 81 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Brown, R. A. Miller, H. N. Camp, D. A. Guise, and H. K. Walker Empirical Derivation of an Electronic Clinically Useful Problem Statement System Ann Intern Med, July 20, 1999; 131(2): 117 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Westberg and R. A. Miller The Basis for Using the Internet to Support the Information Needs of Primary Care J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1999; 6(1): 6 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D. Bidgood Jr, B. Bray, N. Brown, A. R. Mori, K. A. Spackman, A. Golichowski, R. H. Jones, L. Korman, B. Dove, L. Hildebrand, et al. Image Acquisition Context: Procedure Description Attributes for Clinically Relevant Indexing and Selective Retrieval of Biomedical Images J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1999; 6(1): 61 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Chute, S. P. Cohn, and J. R. Campbell A Framework for Comprehensive Health Terminology Systems in the United States: Development Guidelines, Criteria for Selection, and Public Policy Implications J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 1998; 5(6): 503 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Henry, J. J. Warren, L. Lange, and P. Button A Review of Major Nursing Vocabularies and the Extent to Which They Have the Characteristics Required for Implementation in Computer-based Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1998; 5(4): 321 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Schulz, J. W. Barrett, and C. Price Read Code Quality Assurance: From Simple Syntax to Semantic Stability J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1998; 5(4): 337 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Dolin, S. M. Huff, R. A. Rocha, K. A. Spackman, and K. E. Campbell Evaluation of a "Lexically Assign, Logically Refine" Strategy for Semi-automated Integration of Overlapping Terminologies J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 1998; 5(2): 203 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Campbell, D. E. Oliver, and E. H. Shortliffe The Unified Medical Language System: Toward a Collaborative Approach for Solving Terminologic Problems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1998; 5(1): 12 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bodenreider, A. Burgun, G. Botti, M. Fieschi, P. L. Beux, and F. Kohler Evaluation of the Unified Medical Language System as a Medical Knowledge Source J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1998; 5(1): 76 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Hardiker and A. L. Rector Modeling Nursing Terminology Using the GRAIL Representation Language J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1998; 5(1): 120 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Humphreys, A. T. McCray, and M. L. Cheh Evaluating the Coverage of Controlled Health Data Terminologies: Report on the Results of the NLM/AHCPR Large Scale Vocabulary Test J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 1997; 4(6): 484 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Elson, J. G. Faughnan, and D. P. Connelly An Industrial Process View of Information Delivery to Support Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Systems Design and Process Measures J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1997; 4(4): 266 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Henry and C. N. Mead Nursing Classification Systems: Necessary but not Sufficient for Representing "What Nurses Do" for Inclusion in Computer-based Patient Record Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1997; 4(3): 222 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Campbell, P. Carpenter, C. Sneiderman, S. Cohn, C. G. Chute, and J. Warren Phase II Evaluation of Clinical Coding Schemes: Completeness, Taxonomy, Mapping, Definitions, and Clarity J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1997; 4(3): 238 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Schulz, C. Price, and P. J. B. Brown Symbolic Anatomic Knowledge Representation in the Read Codes Version 3: Structure and Application J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1997; 4(1): 38 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |