| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Research Paper |
Affiliations of the authors: Departments of Internal Medicine and Information Technology Services (JRC); College of Nursing and University Hospital (JW); University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha NE; Section of Medical Information Resources, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN (PC, CGC); Cognitive Science Branch, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD (CS); Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland CA (SC).
Correspondence and reprints: James R. Campbell MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska MC, 600 South 42nd Street, Omaha, NE 68198-3331. E-mail: CAMPBELL{at}UNMC.EDU
Abstract Objective: To compare three potential sources of controlled clinical terminology (READ codes version 3.1, SNOMED International, and Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) version 1.6) relative to attributes of completeness, clinical taxonomy, administrative mapping, term definitions and clarity (duplicate coding rate).
Methods: The authors assembled 1929 source concept records from a variety of clinical information taken from four medical centers across the United States. The source data included medical as well as ample nursing terminology. The source records were coded in each scheme by an investigator and checked by the coding scheme owner. The codings were then scored by an independent panel of clinicians for acceptability. Codes were checked for definitions provided with the scheme. Codes for a random sample of source records were analyzed by an investigator for "parent" and "child" codes within the scheme. Parent and child pairs were scored by an independent panel of medical informatics specialists for clinical acceptability. Administrative and billing code mapping from the published scheme were reviewed for all coded records and analyzed by independent reviewers for accuracy. The investigator for each scheme exhaustively searched a sample of coded records for duplications.
Results: SNOMED was judged to be significantly more complete in coding the source material than the other schemes (SNOMED* 70%; READ 57%; UMLS 50%; *p <.00001). SNOMED also had a richer clinical taxonomy judged by the number of acceptable first-degree relatives per coded concept (SNOMED* 4.56; UMLS 3.17; READ 2.14, *p <.005). Only the UMLS provided any definitions; these were found for 49% of records which had a coding assignment. READ and UMLS had better administrative mappings (composite score: READ* 40.6%; UMLS* 36.1%; SNOMED 20.7%, *p <. 00001), and SNOMED had substantially more duplications of coding assignments (duplication rate: READ 0%; UMLS 4.2%; SNOMED* 13.9%, *p <. 004) associated with a loss of clarity.
Conclusion: No major terminology source can lay claim to being the ideal resource for a computer-based patient record. However, based upon this analysis of releases for April 1995, SNOMED International is considerably more complete, has a compositional nature and a richer taxonomy. It suffers from less clarity, resulting from a lack of syntax and evolutionary changes in its coding scheme. READ has greater clarity and better mapping to administrative schemes (ICD-10 and OPCS-4), is rapidly changing and is less complete. UMLS is a rich lexical resource, with mappings to many source vocabularies. It provides definitions for many of its terms. However, due to the varying granularities and purposes of its source schemes, it has limitations for representation of clinical concepts within a computer-based patient record.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. T. Rosenbloom, R. A. Miller, K. B. Johnson, P. L. Elkin, and S. H. Brown A Model for Evaluating Interface Terminologies J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 65 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Andrews, R. L. Richesson, and J. Krischer Variation of SNOMED CT Coding of Clinical Research Concepts among Coding Experts J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 497 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Richesson, J. E. Andrews, and J. P. Krischer Use of SNOMED CT to Represent Clinical Research Data: A Semantic Characterization of Data Items on Case Report Forms in Vasculitis Research J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2006; 13(5): 536 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. T. Rosenbloom, R. A. Miller, K. B. Johnson, P. L. Elkin, and S. H. Brown Interface Terminologies: Facilitating Direct Entry of Clinical Data into Electronic Health Record Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2006; 13(3): 277 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Rothschild and H. P. Lehmann Information Retrieval Performance of Probabilistically Generated, Problem-Specific Computerized Provider Order Entry Pick-Lists: A Pilot Study J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 322 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J B Brown, V. Warmington, M. Laurence, and A T. Prevost Randomised crossover trial comparing the performance of Clinical Terms Version 3 and Read Codes 5 byte set coding schemes in general practice BMJ, May 22, 2003; 326(7399): 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Hripcsak and A. Wilcox Reference Standards, Judges, and Comparison Subjects: Roles for Experts in Evaluating System Performance J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2002; 9(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Coenen, H. F. Marin, H.-A. Park, and S. Bakken Collaborative Efforts for Representing Nursing Concepts in Computer-based Systems: International Perspectives J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2001; 8(3): 202 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Cimino, V. L. Patel, and A. W. Kushniruk Studying the Human- Computer-Terminology Interface J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2001; 8(2): 163 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Stausberg, H. Lang, U. Obertacke, and F. Rauhut Classifications in Routine Use: Lessons from ICD-9 and ICPM in Surgical Practice J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2001; 8(1): 92 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bakken, K. E. Campbell, J. J. Cimino, S. M. Huff, and W. E. Hammond Toward Vocabulary Domain Specifications for Health Level 7--coded Data Elements J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2000; 7(4): 333 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bakken, M. S. Cashen, E. A. Mendonca, A. O'Brien, and J. Zieniewicz Representing Nursing Activities within a Concept-oriented Terminological System: Evaluation of aType Definition J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2000; 7(1): 81 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. White, L. M. Kolar, and S. J. Steindel Evaluation of Vocabularies for Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health Agencies J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1999; 6(3): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. E. Westberg and R. A. Miller The Basis for Using the Internet to Support the Information Needs of Primary Care J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1999; 6(1): 6 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. B. Henry, J. J. Warren, L. Lange, and P. Button A Review of Major Nursing Vocabularies and the Extent to Which They Have the Characteristics Required for Implementation in Computer-based Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1998; 5(4): 321 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Button, I. Androwich, L. Hibben, V. Kern, G. Madden, K. Marek, B. Westra, C. Zingo, and C. N. Mead Challenges and Issues Related to Implementation of Nursing Vocabularies in Computer-based Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1998; 5(4): 332 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Schulz, J. W. Barrett, and C. Price Read Code Quality Assurance: From Simple Syntax to Semantic Stability J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1998; 5(4): 337 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Campbell, D. E. Oliver, and E. H. Shortliffe The Unified Medical Language System: Toward a Collaborative Approach for Solving Terminologic Problems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 1998; 5(1): 12 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. L. Humphreys, A. T. McCray, and M. L. Cheh Evaluating the Coverage of Controlled Health Data Terminologies: Report on the Results of the NLM/AHCPR Large Scale Vocabulary Test J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 1997; 4(6): 484 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. E. Hammond Call for a Standard Clinical Vocabulary J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1997; 4(3): 254 - 255. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
