| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Review Paper |
Affiliations of the authors: School of Nursing, Noordelijke Hogeschool Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden (WTFG), Leidse Hogeschool, Leiden (PJMME), University Hospital Nijmegen, Sint Raboud (TF), University of Groningen (TWND, WJAvdH), University of Maastricht (AH), The Netherlands.
Correspondence and reprints: William T. F. Goossen, RN, BSN, CertEdN, School of Nursing, Noordelijke Hogeschool Leeuwarden, P.O. Box 1080, 8900 Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Abstract It is often argued that Nursing Minimal Data Sets (NMDSs) have advantages for the nursing profession. The NMDSs that have been developed and applied in some countries have many features in common, but there are differences in purpose, content, sampling, collection approach, and developmental stage as well. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of data sets of nursing practice, and the differences and similarities of five national and international NMDS systems. The purpose is to apply this information toward an NMDS initiative in the Netherlands. Future initiatives in NMDS development should include international coordination.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Needleman, E. T. Kurtzman, and K. W. Kizer Performance Measurement of Nursing Care: State of the Science and the Current Consensus Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2007; 64(2_suppl): 10S - 43S. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ozbolt Terminology Standards for Nursing: Collaboration at the Summit J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2000; 7(6): 517 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |