| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Review |
Affiliation of the authors: University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Correspondence and reprints: Patricia F. Brennan, RN, PhD, FAAN, Bascom Moehlman Professor, School of Nursing and College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706. e-mail: <pbrennan{at}engr.wisc.edu>.
Abstract If nurses, physicians, and health care planners knew more about patients' health-related preferences, care would most likely be cheaper, more effective, and closer to the individuals' desires. In order for patient preferences to be effectively used in the delivery of health care, it is important that patients be able to formulate and express preferences, that these judgments be made known to the clinician at the time of care, and that these statements meaningfully inform care activities. Decision theory and health informatics offer promising strategies for eliciting subjective values and making them accessible in a clinical encounter in a manner that drives health choices. Computer-based elicitation and reporting tools are proving acceptable to patients and clinicians alike. It is time for the informatics community to turn their attention toward building computer-based applications that support clinicians in the complex cognitive process of integrating patient preferences with scientific knowledge, clinical practice guidelines, and the realities of contemporary health care.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Eysenbach Recent advances: Consumer health informatics BMJ, June 24, 2000; 320(7251): 1713 - 1716. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Brennan Knowing What To Do: International Perspectives on the Roles of Clinical Guidelines and Patient Preferences in Patient Care J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1998; 5(3): 317 - 318. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |