This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berry, E. Articles by Cook, N. J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berry, E. Articles by Cook, N. J. A.

Systematic Assessment of World Wide Web Materials for Medical Education

Online, Cooperative Peer Review

Affiliations of the authors: The University of Leeds, Leeds, England (EB, CP-J, RGJ, PJRH, NJAC); St. James's and Seacroft NHS Trust, Leeds (HOH); University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales (JAN).

Correspondence and reprints: Dr. Elizabeth Berry, Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Wellcome Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom. e-mail: <eberry{at}leeds.ac.uk>.

Abstract Objective: To develop a generic methodology for the online assessment of medical education materials available on the World Wide Web and to implement it for pilot subject areas.

Design: An online questionnaire was developed, based on an existing scheme for computer-based learning material. It was extended to involve five stages, covering general suitability, local suitability, the user interface, educational style, and a general review. It is available on the Web, so expert reviewers may be recruited from outside the home institution. The methodology was piloted in three subject areas—clinical chemistry, radiology, and medical physics—concentrating initially on undergraduate teaching.

Measurements: The contents of completed questionnaires were stored in an offline database. Selected fields, likely to be of use to students and educators searching for material, were input into an online database.

Results: The online assessment was used successfully in clinical chemistry and medical physics but less well in radiology. Fewer resources were found to fit local needs than expected.

Conclusion: The methodology was found to work well for topics where teaching is highly structured and formal and is potentially applicable in other such disciplines. The approach produces more structured and applicable lists of resources than can be obtained from search engines.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. D'Alessandro and P. Kingsley Creating a Pediatric Digital Library for Pediatric Health Care Providers and Families: Using Literature and Data to Define Common Pediatric Problems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2002; 9(2): 161 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. D'Alessandro, P. Kingsley, and J. Johnson-West The Readability of Pediatric Patient Education Materials on the World Wide Web Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2001; 155(7): 807 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. D'Alessandro, M. P. D'Alessandro, and S. I. Colbert A Proposed Solution for Addressing the Challenge of Patient Cries for Help Through an Analysis of Unsolicited Electronic Mail Pediatrics, June 1, 2000; 105(6): 74e - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text]