This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by White, M. D. Articles by Steindel, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by White, M. D. Articles by Steindel, S. J.

Evaluation of Vocabularies for Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health Agencies

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Correspondence and reprints: Steven J. Steindel, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE (MS G-23), Atlanta, GA 30341. e-mail: <sns6{at}cdc.gov >.

Clinical laboratories and clinicians transmit certain laboratory test results to public health agencies as required by state or local law. Most of these surveillance data are currently received by conventional mail or facsimile transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, and Association of Public Health Laboratories are preparing to implement surveillance systems that will use existing laboratory information systems to transmit electronic laboratory results to appropriate public health agencies. The authors anticipate that this will improve the reporting efficiency for these laboratories, reduce manual data entry, and greatly increase the timeliness and utility of the data. The vocabulary and messaging standards used should encourage participation in these new electronic reporting systems by minimizing the cost and inconvenience to laboratories while providing for accurate and complete communication of needed data. This article describes public health data requirements and the influence of vocabulary and messaging standards on implementation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Richesson, J. E. Andrews, and J. P. Krischer Use of SNOMED CT to Represent Clinical Research Data: A Semantic Characterization of Data Items on Case Report Forms in Vasculitis Research J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2006; 13(5): 536 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Zollo and S. M. Huff Automated Mapping of Observation Codes Using Extensional Definitions J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2000; 7(6): 586 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text]