This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weiner, M. Articles by Bass, E. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weiner, M. Articles by Bass, E. B.

Contrasting Views of Physicians and Nurses about an Inpatient Computer-based Provider Order-entry System

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.

Correspondence and reprints: Michael Weiner, MD, MPH, The Johns Hopkins University, 1830 E. Monument Street, Room 8016, Baltimore, MD 21205. e-mail: <michael{at}weiner.org >.

Objective: Many hospitals are investing in computer-based provider order-entry (POE) systems, and providers' evaluations have proved important for the success of the systems. The authors assessed how physicians and nurses viewed the effects of one modified commercial POE system on time spent patients, resource utilization, errors with orders, and overall quality of care.

Design: Survey.

Measurements: Opinions of 271 POE users on medicine wards of an urban teaching hospital: 96 medical house officers, 49 attending physicians, 19 clinical fellows with heavy inpatient loads, and 107 nurses.

Results: Responses were received from 85 percent of the sample. Most physicians and nurses agreed that orders were executed faster under POE. About 30 percent of house officers and attendings or fellows, compared with 56 percent of nurses, reported improvement in overall quality of care with POE. Forty-four percent of house officers and 34 percent of attendings/fellows reported that their time with patients decreased, whereas 56 percent of nurses indicated that their time with patients increased (P < 0.001). Sixty percent of house officers and 41 percent of attendings/fellows indicated that order errors increased, whereas 69 percent of nurses indicated a decrease or no change in errors. Although most nurses reported no change in the frequency of ordering tests and medications with POE, 61 percent of house officers reported an increased frequency.

Conclusion: Physicians and nurses had markedly different views about effects of a POE system on patient care, highlighting the need to consider both perspectives when assessing the impact of POE. With this POE system, most nurses saw beneficial effects, whereas many physicians saw negative effects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Walker, P. Carayon, N. Leveson, R. A. Paulus, J. Tooker, H. Chin, A. Bothe Jr., and W. F. Stewart EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 272 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Vishwanath and S. D. Scamurra Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model Health Informatics Journal, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 119 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Dorr, L. M. Bonner, A. N. Cohen, R. S. Shoai, R. Perrin, E. Chaney, and A. S. Young Informatics Systems to Promote Improved Care for Chronic Illness: A Literature Review J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2007; 14(2): 156 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ko, J. Abarca, D. C. Malone, D. C. Dare, D. Geraets, A. Houranieh, W. N. Jones, W. P. Nichol, G. P. Schepers, and M. Wilhardt Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 56 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Knight, S. J. Kravet, G. M. Harper, and B. Leff The Effect of Computerized Provider Order Entry on Medical Student Clerkship Experiences J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 554 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Rothschild and H. P. Lehmann Information Retrieval Performance of Probabilistically Generated, Problem-Specific Computerized Provider Order Entry Pick-Lists: A Pilot Study J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 322 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Aarts, H. Doorewaard, and M. Berg Understanding Implementation: The Case of a Computerized Physician Order Entry System in a Large Dutch University Medical Center J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2004; 11(3): 207 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Ash, M. Berg, and E. Coiera Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2004; 11(2): 104 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bhosle and S. S. Sansgiry Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems: Is the Pharmacist's Role Justified? J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2004; 11(2): 125 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Kuperman and R. F. Gibson Computer Physician Order Entry: Benefits, Costs, and Issues Ann Intern Med, July 1, 2003; 139(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. van der Meijden, H. J. Tange, J. Troost, and A. Hasman Determinants of Success of Inpatient Clinical Information Systems: A Literature Review J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2003; 10(3): 235 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Lovis, M. K. Chapko, D. P. Martin, T. H. Payne, R. H. Baud, P. J. Hoey, and S. D. Fihn Evaluation of a Command-line Parser-based Order Entry Pathway for the Department of Veterans Affairs Electronic Patient Record J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2001; 8(5): 486 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Murff and J. Kannry Physician Satisfaction with Two Order Entry Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2001; 8(5): 499 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]