help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Huff, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Huff, S. M.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 6:444-446 (1999)
© 1999 American Medical Informatics Association


Viewpoint

The Decline and Fall of Esperanto

Lessons for Standards Committees

Robert Patterson, MD, MSc and Stanley M. Huff, MD

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Robert Patterson, MD, MSc, Box 336, Squamish, British Columbia, Canada V0N 3GO. e-mail: <robpatterson{at}attcanada.net>.

In 1887, Polish physician Ludovic Zamenhof introduced Esperanto, a simple, easy-to-learn planned language. His goal was to erase communication barriers between ethnic groups by providing them with a politically neutral, culturally free standard language. His ideas received both praise and condemnation from the leaders of his time. Interest in Esperanto peaked in the 1970s but has since faded somewhat. Despite the logical concept and intellectual appeal of a standard language, Esperanto has not evolved into a dominant worldwide language. Instead, English, with all its idiosyncrasies, is closest to an international lingua franca. Like Zamenhof, standards committees in medical informatics have recognized communication chaos and have tried to establish working models, with mixed results. In some cases, previously shunned proprietary systems have become the standard. A proposed standard, no matter how simple, logical, and well designed, may have difficulty displacing an imperfect but functional "real life" system.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
N. R. Hardiker, D. Hoy, and A. Casey
Standards for Nursing Terminology
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2000; 7(6): 523 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Medical Informatics Association.