| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Model Formulation |
1 University of CaliforniaSan Francisco, San Francisco,
California
2 Columbia University, New York, New York
3 Stanford Health Care, San Francisco and Stanford,
California
Corresdpondence and reprints: Suzanne Bakken, RN, DNSc, Box 0608, University of CaliforniaSan Francisco, San Francisco, CA; e-mail: suh7001{at}flux.cpmc.columbia.edu .
Received for publication: 06/22/99; accepted for publication: 09/16/99.
Objective: A type definition, as a component of the categorical structures of a concept-oriented terminology, must support nonambiguous concept representations and, consequently, comparisons of data that are represented using different terminologies. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the adequacy and utility of a proposed type definition for nursing activity concepts.
Design: Nursing activity terms (n = 1039) from patient charts and intervention terms from two nursing terminologies (Home Health Care Classification and Omaha System) were decomposed into the attributes of the proposed type definitionDelivery Mode, Activity Focus, and Recipient.
Measurements: Attributes of the type definition were coded as present or absent for each term by multiple raters. In addition, Delivery Mode was rated as Explicit or Implicit and Recipient was rated as Explicit, Implicit, or Ambiguous. The data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Inter-rater reliabilities were calculated for each attribute of the type definition.
Results: All attributes of the type definition were present in 73.9 percent of the chart terms, 91.3 percent of Home Health Care Classification intervention terms, and 63.5 percent of Omaha System intervention terms. While Delivery Mode and Activity Focus were almost universally present, Recipient was problematic. It was rated as ambiguous in 4.8 percent of the chart terms, 8.7 percent of Home Health Care Classification intervention terms, and 36.5 percent of Omaha System intervention terms.
Conclusions: The study findings supported the adequacy and utility of the type definition. Further research is needed to refine the type definition and its use for representing nursing activity concepts within a concept-oriented terminological system.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. Mendonca Clinical Decision Support Systems: Perspectives in Dentistry J Dent Educ., June 1, 2004; 68(6): 589 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-I. Hwang, J. J. Cimino, and S. Bakken Integrating Nursing Diagnostic Concepts into the Medical Entities Dictionary Using the ISO Reference Terminology Model for Nursing Diagnosis J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2003; 10(4): 382 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Coenen, H. F. Marin, H.-A. Park, and S. Bakken Collaborative Efforts for Representing Nursing Concepts in Computer-based Systems: International Perspectives J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2001; 8(3): 202 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Hardiker and A. L. Rector Structural Validation of Nursing Terminologies J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2001; 8(3): 212 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bakken, J. J. Cimino, R. Haskell, R. Kukafka, C. Matsumoto, G. K. Chan, and S. M. Huff Evaluation of the Clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) Semantic Structure as a Terminology Model for Standardized Assessment Measures J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2000; 7(6): 529 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Harris, J. R. Graves, H. R. Solbrig, P. L. Elkin, and C. G. Chute Embedded Structures and Representation of Nursing Knowledge J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2000; 7(6): 539 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Cimino From Data to Knowledge through Concept-oriented Terminologies: Experience with the Medical Entities Dictionary J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2000; 7(3): 288 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |