help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mekhjian, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mekhjian, H. S.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:16-24. DOI .
© 2002 American Medical Informatics Association


Implementation Brief

Key Attributes of a Successful Physician Order Entry System Implementation in a Multi-hospital Environment

Asif Ahmad, MS, MBA, Phyllis Teater, MBA, Thomas D. Bentley, MS, RNC, Lynn Kuehn, MSN, RN, Rajee R. Kumar, PhD, Andrew Thomas, MD, MBA and Hagop S. Mekhjian, MD

Affiliation of the authors: The Ohio State University Health Systems, Columbus, Ohio.

Correspondence and reprints: Asif Ahmad, MS, MBA, Chief Information Officer, 1-001, Battelle, 1375 Perry Street, Columbus, OH 43201; e-mail: <Ahmad-1{at}medctr.osu.edu>.

Received for publication: 05/18/01; accepted for publication: 10/09/01.

The benefits of computerized physician order entry have been widely recognized, although few institutions have successfully installed these systems. Obstacles to successful implementation are organizational as well as technical. In the spring of 2000, following a 4-year period of planning and customization, a 9-month pilot project, and a 14-month hiatus for year 2000, the Ohio State University Health System extensively implemented physician order entry across inpatient units. Implementation for specialty and community services is targeted for completion in 2002. On implemented units, all orders are processed through the system, with 80 percent being entered by physicians and the rest by nursing or other licensed care providers. The system is deployable across diverse clinical environments, focused on physicians as the primary users, and accepted by clinicians. These are the three criteria by which the authors measured the success of their implementation. They believe that the availability of specialty-specific order sets, the engagement of physician leadership, and a large-scale system implementation were key strategic factors that enabled physician-users to accept a physician order entry system despite significant changes in workflow.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. L. Callen, J. I. Westbrook, and J. Braithwaite
The Effect of Physicians' Long-term Use of CPOE on Their Test Management Work Practices
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 643 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
C. Sicotte, G. Pare, M.-P. Moreault, and A. Paccioni
A Risk Assessment of Two Interorganizational Clinical Information Systems
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2006; 13(5): 557 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. R. Jacobs, R. J. Brilli, and K. Ward Hart
Perceived Increase in Mortality After Process and Policy Changes Implemented With Computerized Physician Order Entry
Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1451 - 1452.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. S. Upperman, P. Staley, K. Friend, J. Benes, J. Dailey, W. Neches, and E. S. Wiener
The Introduction of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Change Management in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital
Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): e634 - e642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. S. Rothschild and H. P. Lehmann
Information Retrieval Performance of Probabilistically Generated, Problem-Specific Computerized Provider Order Entry Pick-Lists: A Pilot Study
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 322 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. J. Kuperman and R. F. Gibson
Computer Physician Order Entry: Benefits, Costs, and Issues
Ann Intern Med, July 1, 2003; 139(1): 31 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. S. Ash, P. N. Gorman, M. Lavelle, T. H. Payne, T. A. Massaro, G. L. Frantz, and J. A. Lyman
A Cross-site Qualitative Study of Physician Order Entry
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2003; 10(2): 188 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. R. Hersh
Medical Informatics: Improving Health Care Through Information
JAMA, October 23, 2002; 288(16): 1955 - 1958.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
H. S. Mekhjian, R. R. Kumar, L. Kuehn, T. D. Bentley, P. Teater, A. Thomas, B. Payne, and A. Ahmad
Immediate Benefits Realized Following Implementation of Physician Order Entry at an Academic Medical Center
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2002; 9(5): 529 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Medical Informatics Association.