| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Research Paper |
Affiliations of the authors: Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Lawton, Oklahoma (DFC); University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas.
Correspondence and reprint requests: Dan F. Criswell, MD, 4427 West Gore Boulevard, Lawton, OK 73505; e-mail: <dan-criswell{at}ouhsc.edu>.
Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the uses of handheld computers (also called personal digital assistants, or PDAs) in family practice residency programs in the United States.
Study Design: In November 2000, the authors mailed a questionnaire to the program directors of all American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and American College of Osteopathic Family Practice (ACOFP) residency programs in the United States.
Measurements: Data and patterns of the use and non-use of handheld computers were identified.
Results: Approximately 50 percent (306 of 610) of the programs responded to the survey. Two thirds of the programs reported that handheld computers were used in their residencies, and an additional 14 percent had plans for implementation within 24 months. Both the Palm and the Windows CE operating systems were used, with the Palm operating system the most common. Military programs had the highest rate of use (8 of 10 programs, 80 percent), and osteopathic programs had the lowest (23 of 55 programs, 42 percent). Of programs that reported handheld computer use, 45 percent had required handheld computer applications that are used uniformly by all users. Funding for handheld computers and related applications was non-budgeted in 76percent of the programs in which handheld computers were used. In programs providing a budget for handheld computers, the average annual budget per user was $461.58. Interested faculty or residents, rather than computer information services personnel, performed upkeep and maintenance of handheld computers in 72 percent of the programs in which the computers are used. In addition to the installed calendar, memo pad, and address book, the most common clinical uses of handheld computers in the programs were as medication reference tools, electronic textbooks, and clinical computational or calculator-type programs.
Conclusions: Handheld computers are widely used in family practice residency programs in the United States. Although handheld computers were designed as electronic organizers, in family practice residencies they are used as medication reference tools, electronic textbooks, and clinical computational programs and to track activities that were previously associated with desktop database applications.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  N. J. Bosomworth Medical palmistry: Creating hyperlinked documents for the small screen Can Fam Physician, July 1, 2008; 54(7): 986 - 987. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Yu, T. K. Houston, M. N. Ray, D. Q. Garner, and E. S. Berner Patterns of Use of Handheld Clinical Decision Support Tools in the Clinical Setting Med Decis Making, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 744 - 753. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Hauser, D. Demner-Fushman, J. L. Jacobs, S. M. Humphrey, G. Ford, and G. R. Thoma Using Wireless Handheld Computers to Seek Information at the Point of Care: An Evaluation by Clinicians J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 807 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pluye, R. M. Grad, N. Mysore, L. Knaapen, J. Johnson-Lafleur, and M. Dawes Systematically Assessing the Situational Relevance of Electronic Knowledge Resources: A Mixed Methods Study J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 616 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. N. Ray, T. K. Houston, F. B. Yu, N. Menachemi, R. S. Maisiak, J. J. Allison, and E. S. Berner Development and Testing of a Scale to Assess Physician Attitudes about Handheld Computers with Decision Support J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2006; 13(5): 567 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Mattana, M. Charitou, L. Mills, C. Baskin, H. Steinberg, C. Tu, and H. Kerpen Personal Digital Assistants: A Review of Their Application in Graduate Medical Education American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 262 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Horsley and L Forster Handheld computers in medicine: the way forward Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2005; 81(957): 481 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. W. Boonn and A. E. Flanders Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): Survey of Personal Digital Assistant Use in Radiology RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 537 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. S. Main, J. Quintela, R. Araya-Guerra, S. Holcomb, and W. D. Pace Exploring Patient Reactions to Pen-Tablet Computers: A Report from CaReNet Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 421 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Carroll, P. Tarczy-Hornoch, E. O'Reilly, and D. A. Christakis The Effect of Point-of-Care Personal Digital Assistant Use on Resident Documentation Discrepancies Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 450 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. G. McLeod, J. O. Ebbert, and J. F. Lymp Survey Assessment of Personal Digital Assistant Use among Trainees and Attending Physicians J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2003; 10(6): 605 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Fischer, T. E. Stewart, S. Mehta, R. Wax, and S. E. Lapinsky Handheld Computing in Medicine J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2003; 10(2): 139 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. R. Hersh Medical Informatics: Improving Health Care Through Information JAMA, October 23, 2002; 288(16): 1955 - 1958. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. A. Adatia and P. L. Bedard "Palm reading": 1. Handheld hardware and operating systems Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2002; 167(7): 775 - 780. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Neely and D. F. Sittig Basic Microbiologic and Infection Control Information to Reduce the Potential Transmission of Pathogens to Patients via Computer Hardware J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2002; 9(5): 500 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
