help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeng, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Zou, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeng, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Zou, K. H.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 9:294-305 (2002)
© 2002 American Medical Informatics Association


Research Paper

Providing Concept-oriented Views for Clinical Data Using a Knowledge-based System

An Evaluation

Qing Zeng, PhD, James J. Cimino, MD and Kelly H. Zou, PhD

Affiliations of the authors: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (QZ, KHZ); Columbia University, New York, New York (JJC).

Correspondence and reprints: Qing Zeng, PhD, Decision System Group, Thorn Building #309, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: <Qzeng{at}dsg.harvard.edu>.

Objective: Clinical information systems typically present patient data in chronologic order, organized by the source of the information (e.g., laboratory, radiology). This study evaluates the functionality and utility of a knowledge-based system that generates concept-oriented views (organized around clinical concepts such as disease or organ system) of clinical data.

Design: The authors have developed a system that uses a knowledge base of interrelationships between medical concepts to infer relationships between data in electronic medical records. They use these inferences to produce summaries, or views, of the data that are relevant to a specific concept of interest. They evaluated the ability of the system to select relevant information, reduce information overload, and support physician information retrieval.

Measurements: The sensitivity and specificity of the system for identifying relevant patient information were calculated. Effect on information overload was assessed by comparing the amount of information in each view with the amount of information in the entire record. Information retrieval accuracy and cost (time) were used to measure the effect of using conceptoriented views on the efficiency and effectiveness of retrievals.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the system for identifying relevant clinical information were generally in the range of 70 to 80 percent. Concept-oriented views are effective in reducing the amount of information retrieved (over 80 percent reduction) and, compared with sourceoriented views, are able to improve physician retrieval accuracy (p=0.04).

Conclusion: Computer-generated, concept-oriented views can be used to reduce clinician information overload and improve the accuracy of clinical data retrieval.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. Choi, M. L. Jenkins, J. J. Cimino, T. M. White, and S. Bakken
Toward Semantic Interoperability in Home Health Care: Formally Representing OASIS Items for Integration into a Concept-oriented Terminology
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 410 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J.-I. Hwang, J. J. Cimino, and S. Bakken
Integrating Nursing Diagnostic Concepts into the Medical Entities Dictionary Using the ISO Reference Terminology Model for Nursing Diagnosis
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2003; 10(4): 382 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Medical Informatics Association.