help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Athley, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Athley, B. D.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:311-319. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M0976.
© 2002 American Medical Informatics Association


Research Paper

Investigating Users' Requirements

Computer-based Anatomy Learning Modules for Multiple User Test Beds

Deborah S. Walker, DNSc, CNM, FACNM, Wen-Yu Lee, MS, Neil M. Skov, EdD, Carl F. Berger, EdD and Brian D. Athley, PhD

Affiliation of the authors: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Correspondence and reprints: Deborah Walker, DNSc, CNM, FACNM, Assistant Professor and Coordinator, Nurse–Midwifery Education Program, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Room 3320, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0482; e-mail: <dswalker{at}umich.edu>.

Received for publication: 06/06/01; accepted for publication: 02/18/02.

Objective: User data and information about anatomy education were used to guide development of a learning environment that is efficient and effective. The research question focused on how to design instructional software suitable for the educational goals of different groups of users of the Visible Human data set. The ultimate goal of the study was to provide options for students and teachers to use different anatomy learning modules corresponding to key topics, for course work and professional training.

Design: The research used both qualitative and quantitative methods. It was driven by the belief that good instructional design must address learning context information and pedagogic content information. The data collection emphasized measurement of users' perspectives, experience, and demands in anatomy learning.

Measurement: Users' requirements elicited from 12 focus groups were combined and rated by 11 researchers. Collective data were sorted and analyzed by use of multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis.

Results: A set of functions and features in high demand across all groups of users was suggested by the results. However, several subgroups of users shared distinct demands. The design of the learning modules will encompass both unified core components and user-specific applications. The design templates will allow sufficient flexibility for dynamic insertion of different learning applications for different users.

Conclusion: This study describes how users' requirements, associated with users' learning experiences, were systematically collected and analyzed and then transformed into guidelines informing the iterative design of multiple learning modules. Information about learning challenges and processes was gathered to define essential anatomy teaching strategies. A prototype instrument to design and polish the Visible Human user interface system is currently being developed using ideas and feedback from users.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Medical Informatics Association.