help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Treweek, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Penrose, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Treweek, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Penrose, A.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:346-358. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M1070.
© 2002 American Medical Informatics Association


Review

Computer-generated Patient Education Materials: Do They Affect Professional Practice?

A Systematic Review

Shaun P. Treweek, PhD, Claire Glenton, Andrew D. Oxman, MSc, MD, Alister Penrose and B Comm

Affiliations of the authors: Department of Health Services Research, Oslo, Norway (SPT, CG, ADO); Wairau Hospital, Blenheim, New Zealand (AP).

Correspondence and reprints: Shaun P. Treweek, PhD, Department of Health Services Research, Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Welfare, P.O. Box 8054 Dep, N-0031 Oslo, Norway; e-mail: <streweek{at}online.no>.

A systematic search of seven electronic databases was done to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of computer-generated patient education material (PEM) on professional practice. Three studies met the authors' criteria.

All three studies involved preventive care. All used a complex intervention of which computer-generated PEM was a major component. Improvements in practice were seen in all studies, although these gains were generally modest. One study showed improvement in patient outcomes. Mann-Whitney statistics calculated for the studies' outcome measures ranged from 0.48 to 0.66, equivalent to risk differences of -4 to 32 percent.

Computer-generated PEM seems to have a small, positive effect on professional practice. The small number of included studies and the complex nature of the interventions makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the ability of computer-generated PEM to change professional practice. Future work should involve well-defined interventions that can be clearly evaluated in terms of effect and cost.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
K. A Grindrod, P. Patel, and J. E Martin
What Interventions Should Pharmacists Employ to Impact Health Practitioners' Prescribing Practices?
Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2006; 40(9): 1546 - 1557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Medical Informatics Association.