| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Research Paper |
Affiliation of the authors: The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Correspondence and reprints: Hagop S. Mekhjian, MD, Professor of Internal Medicine, Associate Vice President for Health Sciences; Chief Medical Officer, Vice Dean for Cultural Affairs, 130 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210; e-mail: <mekhjian-1{at}medctr.osu.edu>.
Objective: To evaluate the benefits of computerized physician order entry (POE) and electronic medication administration record (eMAR) on the delivery of health care.
Design: Inpatient nursing units in an academic health system were the setting for the study. The study comprised before-and-after comparisons between phase 1, pre-implementation of POE (pre-POE) and phase 2, post-implementation of POE (post-POE) and, within phase 2, a comparison of POE and the combination of POE plus eMAR. Length of stay and cost were compared pre- and post-POE for a period of 10 to 12 months across all services in the respective hospitals.
Measurements: Comparisons were made pre- and post-POE for the time intervals between initiation and completion of pharmacy (pre-POE, n=46; post-POE, n=70), radiology (pre-POE, n=11; post-POE, n=54), and laboratory orders (without POE, n=683; with POE, n=1,142); timeliness of countersignature of verbal order (University Hospitals [OSUH]: pre-POE, n=605; post-POE, n=19,225; James Cancer Hospital (James): pre-POE, n=478; post-POE, n=10,771); volume of nursing transcription errors (POE with manual MAR, n=888; POE with eMAR, n=396); length of stay and total cost (OSUH: pre-POE, n=8,228; post-POE, n=8,154; James: (pre-POE, n=6,471; post-POE, n=6,045).
Results: Statistically significant reductions were seen following the implementation of POE for medication turn-around times (64 percent, from 5:28 hr to 1:51 hr; p<0.001), radiology procedure completion times (43 percent, from 7:37 hr to 4:21 hr; p<0.05), and laboratory result reporting times (25 percent, from 31:3 min to 23:4 min; p=0.001). In addition, POE combined with eMAR eliminated all physician and nursing transcription errors. There were 43 and 26 percent improvements in order countersignature by physicians in OSUH and James, respectively. Severity-adjusted length of stay decreased in OSUH (pre-POE, 3.91 days; post-POE, 3.71 days; p=0.002), but not significantly in James (pre-POE, 3.68 days; post-POE, 3.61 days; p=0.356). Although total cost per admission decreased significantly in selected services, it did not change significantly across either institution (OSUH: pre-POE, $5,697; post-POE, $5,661; p=0.687; James: pre-POE, $6,427; post-POE, $6,518; p=0.502).
Conclusion: Physician order entry and eMAR provided the framework for improvements in patient safety and in the timeliness of care. The significant cultural and workflow changes that accompany the implementation of POE did not adversely affect acuity-adjusted length of stay or total cost. The reductions in transcription errors, medication turn-around times, and timely reporting of results supports the view that POE and eMAR provide a good return on investment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F. FitzHenry, J. F. Peterson, M. Arrieta, L. R. Waitman, J. S. Schildcrout, and R. A. Miller Medication Administration Discrepancies Persist Despite Electronic Ordering J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 756 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Fanikos, A. Erickson, K. E. Munz, M. D. Sanborn, B. C. Ludwig, and T. Van Hassel Observations on the use of ready-to-use and point-of-care activated parenteral products in automated dispensing cabinets in U.S. hospitals Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 1, 2007; 64(19): 2037 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Estellat, I. Colombet, S. Vautier, J. Huault-Quentel, P. Durieux, and B. Sabatier Impact of pharmacy validation in a computerized physician order entry context Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 19(5): 317 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. G. Lo, L. P. Newmark, C. Yoon, L. A. Volk, V. L. Carlson, A. F. Kittler, M. Lippincott, T. Wang, and D. W. Bates Electronic Health Records in Specialty Care: A Time-Motion Study J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 609 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Eslami, A. Abu-Hanna, and N. F. de Keizer Evaluation of Outpatient Computerized Physician Medication Order Entry Systems: A Systematic Review J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 400 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Kuiper, S. R. McCreadie, J. F. Mitchell, and J. G. Stevenson Medication errors in inpatient pharmacy operations and technologies for improvement Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 1, 2007; 64(9): 955 - 959. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Yan Xiao, S. Schimpff, C. Mackenzie, R. Merrell, E. Entin, R. Voigt, and B. Jarrell Video Technology to Advance Safety in the Operating Room and Perioperative Environment Surgical Innovation, March 1, 2007; 14(1): 52 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Gross and D. W. Bates A Pragmatic Approach to Implementing Best Practices for Clinical Decision Support Systems in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 25 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Ko, J. Abarca, D. C. Malone, D. C. Dare, D. Geraets, A. Houranieh, W. N. Jones, W. P. Nichol, G. P. Schepers, and M. Wilhardt Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 56 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Classen, A. J. Avery, and D. W. Bates Evaluation and Certification of Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 48 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. R. Keenan, H. H. Nguyen, and M. Srinivasan Electronic Medical Records and Their Impact on Resident and Medical Student Education Acad Psychiatry, December 1, 2006; 30(6): 522 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Chaudhry, J. Wang, S. Wu, M. Maglione, W. Mojica, E. Roth, S. C. Morton, and P. G. Shekelle Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care Ann Intern Med, May 16, 2006; 144(10): 742 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J I Westbrook, A Georgiou, A Dimos, and T Germanos Computerised pathology test order entry reduces laboratory turnaround times and influences tests ordered by hospital clinicians: a controlled before and after study J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 59(5): 533 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. F. Bria II Applied Medical Informatics for the Chest Physician: Information You Can USE!--Part 2 Chest, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 777 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. B. Hansen, D. Fernald, R. Araya-Guerra, J. M. Westfall, D. West, and W. Pace Pharmacy Clarification of Prescriptions Ordered in Primary Care: A Report from the Applied Strategies for Improving Patient Safety (ASIPS) Collaborative J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2006; 19(1): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Harris, J. C. McGregor, E. N. Perencevich, J. P. Furuno, J. Zhu, D. E. Peterson, and J. Finkelstein The Use and Interpretation of Quasi-Experimental Studies in Medical Informatics J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 16 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Y. Han, J. A. Carcillo, S. T. Venkataraman, R. S.B. Clark, R. S. Watson, T. C. Nguyen, H. Bayir, and R. A. Orr Unexpected Increased Mortality After Implementation of a Commercially Sold Computerized Physician Order Entry System Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1506 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Caudill-Slosberg and W. B. Weeks Case Study: Identifying Potential Problems at the Human/Technical Interface in Complex Clinical Systems American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2005; 20(6): 353 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Cutler, N. E. Feldman, and J. R. Horwitz U.S. Adoption Of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems Health Aff., November 1, 2005; 24(6): 1654 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Knight, S. J. Kravet, G. M. Harper, and B. Leff The Effect of Computerized Provider Order Entry on Medical Student Clerkship Experiences J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 554 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Garland Improving the ICU: Part 2 Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2165 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Juluru and J. Eng Internet-Based Radiology Order-Entry, Reporting, and Workflow Management System for Coordinating Urgent Study Requests During Off-Hours Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 1017 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Spencer, A. Leininger, R. Daniels, R. P. Granko, and R. R. Coeytaux Effect of a computerized prescriber-order-entry system on reported medication errors Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 15, 2005; 62(4): 416 - 419. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Ohsfeldt, M. M. Ward, J. E. Schneider, M. Jaana, T. R. Miller, Y. Lei, and D. S. Wakefield Implementation of Hospital Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in a Rural State: Feasibility and Financial Impact J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 20 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G. Berger and J.P. Kichak Computerized Physician Order Entry: Helpful or Harmful? J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2004; 11(2): 100 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Kaushal, K. G. Shojania, and D. W. Bates The Safety of Computer-Based Medication Systems--Reply Arch Intern Med, February 9, 2004; 164(3): 340 - 340. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Kuperman and R. F. Gibson Computer Physician Order Entry: Benefits, Costs, and Issues Ann Intern Med, July 1, 2003; 139(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
