| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on October 5, 2006
Accepted on July 26, 2007
Affiliation of the authors: 1 Group Health Cooperative, Center for Health Studies, Seattle, WA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Objective To describe the evolution, use, and satisfaction of a patient Web site with a shared medical record between patients and providers at Group Health Cooperative, a mixed-model health care financing and delivery organization based in Seattle, Washington.
Design and Measurements A retrospective, serial, cross-sectional study of the adoption and use of a patient Web site (MyGroupHealth) from 9/2002 through 12/2005 and a mailed satisfaction survey of a random sampling of 2,002 patients who used the patient Web site in August 2004.
Results As of December 2005, 25% (105,047) of all Group Health members had registered and completed an ID-verification process enabling them to use all the available services on MyGroupHealth. ID-verification was more common among patients receiving care in the Integrated Delivery System (33%) compared to patients receiving care in the network (7%). As of December 2005, unique monthly user rates per 1,000 adult members were the highest for review of medical test results (54/1000), medication refills (44/1000), after-visit-summaries (32/1000), and patient-provider clinical messaging (31/1000). The response rate for the patient satisfaction survey was 46% (n=921). 94% of survey respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with MyGroupHealth overall. Patients reported highest satisfaction (satisfied or very satisfied) for medication refills (96%), patient-provider messaging (93%), and medical test results (86%).
Conclusions Use and satisfaction with MyGroupHealth were greatest for accessing services and information involving ongoing, active care and patient-provider communication. Tight integration of Web services with clinical information systems and patient-provider relationships may be important in meeting the needs of patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. C. Kaelber, A. K. Jha, D. Johnston, B. Middleton, and D. W. Bates A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs) J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2008; 15(6): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Green, A. J. Cook, J. D. Ralston, P. A. Fishman, S. L. Catz, J. Carlson, D. Carrell, L. Tyll, E. B. Larson, and R. S. Thompson Effectiveness of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring, Web Communication, and Pharmacist Care on Hypertension Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, June 25, 2008; 299(24): 2857 - 2867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |