This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M1527v1 11/4/249    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Williams, C. A. Articles by Mosley-Williams, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Williams, C. A. Articles by Mosley-Williams, A. D.

Usability of a Computer-assisted Interview System for the Unaided Self-entry of Patient Data in an Urban Rheumatology Clinic

Affiliations of the authors: ArtfulMed.com, Detroit, MI (CAW); Wayne State University, Detroit, MI (TT, ADM-W).

Correspondence and reprints: Carl A. Williams, MD, President, ArtfulMed.com, 15920 Glastonbury, Detroit, MI 48223; e-mail: <cwilliams9{at}mac.com>.

Received for publication: 01/06/04; accepted for publication: 03/14/04.

Objective: This study quantified the ease of use for patients and providers of a microcomputer-based, computer-assisted interview (CAI) system for the serial collection of the American College of Rheumatology Patient Assessment (ACRPA) questionnaire in routine outpatient clinical care in an urban rheumatology clinic.

Design: A cross-sectional survey was used.

Measurements: The answers of 93 respondents to a computer use questionnaire mailed to the 130 participants of a previous validation study of the CAI system were analyzed. For a 30-month period, the percentage of patient visits during which complete ACRPA questionnaire data were obtained with the system was determined.

Results: The computer system provided cost and labor savings in the collection of 2,476 questionnaires for 2,964 patients visits over 30 months for a capture rate of 83.5%. In the last 12 of those months, 1,035 questionnaires were collected for 1,062 patient visits (97.5% capture). There were no missing data. The prestudy capture rate was 13.5%, with 33% of surveys having complete data. Patients rated the overall usability of the system as good (mean = 1.34, standard deviation = 0.61) on a scale of 0–2, where 2 = good, but expressed difficulty with mouse manipulation and concerns about the privacy of the data entry environment.

Conclusion The system proved easy to use and cost-effective for the (mostly) unaided self-entry of self-report data for each patient for each visit in routine outpatient clinical care in an urban rheumatology clinic.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J G Richter, A Becker, T Koch, M Nixdorf, R Willers, R Monser, B Schacher, R Alten, C Specker, and M Schneider Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2008; 67(12): 1739 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T K Kvien, P Mowinckel, T Heiberg, K L Dammann, O Dale, G J Aanerud, T N Alme, and T Uhlig Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2005; 64(10): 1480 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Porter, I. S. Kohane, and D. A. Goldmann Parents as Partners in Obtaining the Medication History J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 299 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]