help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published June 7, 2004 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1518
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1518v1
11/5/403    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aronsky, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dean, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aronsky, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dean, N. C.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:403-409. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M1518.
© 2004 American Medical Informatics Association


Research Paper

Electronic Screening of Dictated Reports to Identify Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Status

Dominik Aronsky, MD, PhD, Evelyn Kasworm, BS, Jay A. Jacobson, MD, Peter J. Haug, MD and Nathan C. Dean, MD

Affiliations of the authors: Departments of Biomedical Informatics & Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (DA); Division of Medical Ethics (EK, JAJ), Department of Medical Informatics (PJH), Division of Pulmonary Medicine (NCD), LDS Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Correspondence and reprints: Dominik Aronsky, MD, PhD, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Eskind Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-8340; e-mail: <dominik.aronsky{at}vanderbilt.edu>.

Received for publication: 12/18/03; accepted for publication: 05/10/04.

Objective: Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and advance directives are increasingly prevalent and may affect medical interventions and outcomes. Simple, automated techniques to identify patients with DNR orders do not currently exist but could help avoid costly and time-consuming chart review. This study hypothesized that a decision to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation would be included in a patient's dictated reports. The authors developed and validated a simple computerized search method, which screens dictated reports to detect patients with DNR status.

Methods A list of concepts related to DNR order documentation was developed using emergency department, hospital admission, consult, and hospital discharge reports of 665 consecutive, hospitalized pneumonia patients during a four-year period (1995–1999). The list was validated in an independent group of 190 consecutive inpatients with pneumonia during a five-month period (1999–2000). The reference standard for the presence of DNR orders was manual chart review of all study patients. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and nonerror rates were calculated for individual and combined concepts.

Results The list of concepts included: DNR, Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate (DNAR), DNI, NCR, advanced directive, living will, power of attorney, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation, arrest, resuscitate, code, and comfort care. As determined by manual chart review, a DNR order was written for 32.6% of patients in the derivation and for 31.6% in the validation group. Dictated reports included DNR order–related information for 74.5% of patients in the derivation and 73% in the validation group. If mentioned in the dictated report, the combined keyword search had a sensitivity of 74.2% in the derivation group (70.0% in the validation group), a specificity of 91.5% (81.5%), a positive predictive value of 80.9% (63.6%), a negative predictive value of 88.0% (85.5%), and a nonerror rate of 85.9% (77.9%). DNR and resuscitate were the most frequently used and power of attorney and advanced directives the least frequently used terms.

Conclusion Dictated hospital reports frequently contained DNR order–related information for patients with a written DNR order. Using an uncomplicated keyword search, electronic screening of dictated reports yielded good accuracy for identifying patients with DNR order information.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. Turchin, N. S. Kolatkar, R. W. Grant, E. C. Makhni, M. L. Pendergrass, and J. S. Einbinder
Using Regular Expressions to Abstract Blood Pressure and Treatment Intensification Information from the Text of Physician Notes
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 691 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Medical Informatics Association.