This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M1598v1 12/2/172    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rood, E. Articles by Zandstra, D. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rood, E. Articles by Zandstra, D. F.

Use of a Computerized Guideline for Glucose Regulation in the Intensive Care Unit Improved Both Guideline Adherence and Glucose Regulation

Affiliations of the authors: Department of Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (ER, RJB, JIV, DFZ) CHIME UCL, London, UK (PT).

Correspondence and reprints: Emmy Rood, MSc, Prinsengracht 24, 1015 DV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; e-mail: <sperood{at}xs4all.nl>.

Received for publication: 04/04/04; accepted for publication: 11/12/04.

Objective To measure the impact of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in an ICU.

Design A randomized, controlled trial with an off-on-off design.

Methods We implemented a glucose regulation guideline in an intensive care unit in paper form during the first study period. During the second period, the guideline was randomly applied in either paper or computerized form. In the third period, the guideline was available only in paper form.

Measurements and results We analyzed data for 484 patients. During the intervention period, the control group included 54 patients and the computerized intervention group included 66 patients. The two guideline-related outcome measures consisted of compliance with: (a) glucose measurement timing recommendations and (b) insulin dose advice. We measured clinical impact as the proportion of time that glucose levels fell within target range. In the first (paper-based) study period, 29.0% of samples occurred with optimal timing; during the second period, this increased to 35.5% for paper-based and to 40.2% for computerized protocols. The third study period timeliness scores reverted to the first period rates. Late (suboptimal) sampling occurred for 66% of glucose measurements in the first study period, for 42% of paper-based and 28% of computer-based protocol samples in the second period, and for 50.0% of samples in the third study period. In the first study period, insulin-dosing guideline compliance was 56.3%; in the second period, it was 64.2% for paper-based and 77.3% for computer-based protocols, and it fell to 42.4% in the third period. For the second study period, the time that a patient's glucose values fell within target range improved for both the control (52.9%) and the computerized groups (54.2%) compared with the first study period (44.3%) and the third period (42.3%).

Conclusion Implementing a computerized version of a guideline significantly improved timeliness of measurements and glucose level regulation for critically ill patients compared with implementing a paper-based version of the guideline.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. A. Spooner and D. C. Classen Data Standards and Improvement of Quality and Safety in Child Health Care Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_2): S74 - S79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. O. Kooij, T. Klok, M. W. Hollmann, and J. E. Kal Decision Support Increases Guideline Adherence for Prescribing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 893 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Dortch, N. T. Mowery, A. Ozdas, L. Dossett, H. Cao, B. Collier, G. Holder, R. A. Miller, and A. K. May A Computerized Insulin Infusion Titration Protocol Improves Glucose Control With Less Hypoglycemia Compared to a Manual Titration Protocol in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 18 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Oeyen, E. A. Hoste, C. D. Roosens, J. M. Decruyenaere, and S. I. Blot Adherence to and Efficacy and Safety of an Insulin Protocol in the Critically Ill: A Prospective Observational Study Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 599 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Cohen, B. Blatter, C. Almeida, and V. L. Patel Reevaluating Recovery: Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 312 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Boord, M. Sharifi, R. A. Greevy, M. R. Griffin, V. K. Lee, T. A. Webb, M. E. May, L. R. Waitman, A. K. May, and R. A. Miller Computer-based Insulin Infusion Protocol Improves Glycemia Control over Manual Protocol J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 278 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Wilson, J. Weinreb, and G. W. S. Hoo Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critical Care: A review of 12 protocols Diabetes Care, April 1, 2007; 30(4): 1005 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. F. Bria II Applied medical informatics for the chest physician: information you can use!--Part 3. Chest, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 1057 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]