This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M2069v1 13/4/372    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kilbridge, P. M. Articles by Mojarrad, M. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kilbridge, P. M. Articles by Mojarrad, M. G.

Automated Surveillance for Adverse Drug Events at a Community Hospital and an Academic Medical Center

^a Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham NC.
^b Duke Health Technology Solutions, Duke University Health System, Duke University, Durham NC.

^_* Correspondence and reprints: Peter M. Kilbridge, M.D., Duke Health Technology Solutions, Duke University Health System, Box 2718, Durham, NC 27705 (Email: peter.kilbridge{at}duke.edu).

Received for publication: 01/31/06; accepted for publication: 04/05/06.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the rates and nature of ADEs at an academic medical center and a community hospital using a single computerized ADE surveillance system.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients admitted to two tertiary care hospitals.

OUTCOME MEASURE: Adverse drug events identified by automated surveillance and voluntary reporting.

METHODS: We implemented an automated surveillance system across an academic medical center and a community hospital. Potential events identified by the computer were reviewed in detail by medication safety pharmacists and scored for causality and severity. Findings were compared between the two hospitals, and with voluntary reports from nurses and pharmacists.

RESULTS: Over the 8 month study period, 25,177 patients were admitted to the university hospital and 8,029 to the community hospital. There were 1,116 ADEs in 900 patients at the university hospital for an overall rate of 4.4 ADEs per 100 admissions. At the community hospital, 399 patients experienced 501 ADEs for a rate of 6.2 events per 100 admissions. Rates of antibiotic-associated colitis, drug-induced hypoglycemia, and anticoagulation-related ADEs were significantly higher at the community hospital compared with the university hospital. Computerized surveillance detected ADEs at a rate 3.6 times that of voluntary reporting at the university hospital and 12.3 times that at the community hospital.

CONCLUSIONS: Operation of a common automated ADE surveillance system across hospitals permits meaningful comparison of ADE rates in different inpatient settings. Automated surveillance detects ADEs at rates far higher than voluntary reporting, and the difference may be greater in the community hospital setting. Community hospitals may experience higher rates of certain types of ADEs compared with academic medical centers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. K. Jha, J. Laguette, A. Seger, and D. W. Bates Can Surveillance Systems Identify and Avert Adverse Drug Events? A Prospective Evaluation of a Commercial Application J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2008; 15(5): 647 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Kilbridge and D. C. Classen The Informatics Opportunities at the Intersection of Patient Safety and Clinical Informatics J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 397 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ferranti, M. M. Horvath, H. Cozart, J. Whitehurst, and J. Eckstrand Reevaluating the Safety Profile of Pediatrics: A Comparison of Computerized Adverse Drug Event Surveillance and Voluntary Reporting in the Pediatric Environment Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1201 - e1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. L. Hinrichsen, B. Kruskal, M. A. O'Brien, T. A. Lieu, R. Platt, and Vaccine Safety Datalink Team Using Electronic Medical Records to Enhance Detection and Reporting of Vaccine Adverse Events J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 731 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Handler, R. L. Altman, S. Perera, J. T. Hanlon, S. A. Studenski, J. E. Bost, M. I. Saul, and D. B. Fridsma A Systematic Review of the Performance Characteristics of Clinical Event Monitor Signals Used to Detect Adverse Drug Events in the Hospital Setting J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 451 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Rosenbloom Approaches to Evaluating Electronic Prescribing J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2006; 13(4): 399 - 401. [Full Text] [PDF]