help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published August 23, 2006 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1995
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1995v1
13/6/696    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Bruijn, B.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Bruijn, B.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A. J.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:696-698. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M1995.
© 2006 American Medical Informatics Association


Case report

Identifying Wrist Fracture Patients with High Accuracy by Automatic Categorization of X-ray Reports

Berry de Bruijn, PhDa,*, Ann Cranney, MD, MScb,c, Siobhan O’Donnell, MScb, Joel D. Martin, PhDa and Alan J. Forster, MD, MScb,c

a National Research Council Canada, Institute for Information Technology
b Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
c Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

* Correspondence and reprints: Berry de Bruijn, Ph.D., NRC-IIT, 1200 Montreal Road, Building M-50, Ottawa ON, Canada K1A 0R6. (Email: berry.debruijn{at}nrc.gc.ca).

Received for publication: 10/21/05; accepted for publication: 07/10/06.

The authors performed this study to determine the accuracy of several text classification methods to categorize wrist x-ray reports. We randomly sampled 751 textual wrist x-ray reports. Two expert reviewers rated the presence (n = 301) or absence (n = 450) of an acute fracture of wrist. We developed two information retrieval (IR) text classification methods and a machine learning method using a support vector machine (TC-1). In cross-validation on the derivation set (n = 493), TC-1 outperformed the two IR based methods and six benchmark classifiers, including Naive Bayes and a Neural Network. In the validation set (n = 258), TC-1 demonstrated consistent performance with 93.8% accuracy; 95.5% sensitivity; 92.9% specificity; and 87.5% positive predictive value. TC-1 was easy to implement and superior in performance to the other classification methods.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
I. A. McCowan, D. C. Moore, A. N. Nguyen, R. V. Bowman, B. E. Clarke, E. E. Duhig, and M.-J. Fry
Collection of Cancer Stage Data by Classifying Free-text Medical Reports
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 736 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Medical Informatics Association.