This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: M2199v1 14/2/198    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van den Brink, J. L. Articles by van Bemmel, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van den Brink, J. L. Articles by van Bemmel, J. H.

Impact on Quality of Life of a Telemedicine System Supporting Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Controlled Trial During the Postoperative Period at Home

^a Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
^b Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
^c Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
^d Institute for Health- and Environmental Issues (IGO), Schijf, The Netherlands.

^_* Correspondence and reprints: Peter Moorman, Room Ee 2110, Department of Medical Informatics, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. (Email: p.moorman{at}erasmusmc.nl).

Received for publication: 07/12/06; accepted for publication: 12/11/06.

Objectives: Telemedicine applications carry the potential to enhance the quality of life of patients, but studies evaluating telemedicine applications are still scarce. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine is limited and not yet conclusive. This study investigated whether telemedicine could be beneficial to the quality of life of cancer patients.

Design and Measurements: Between 1999 and 2002, we conducted a prospective controlled trial evaluating the effects of a telemedicine application on the quality of life of patients with cancer involving the head and neck, using quality of life questionnaires that covered 22 quality of life parameters. All patients had undergone surgery for head and neck cancer at the Erasmus MC, a tertiary university hospital in The Netherlands. Patients in the intervention group were given access to an electronic health information support system for a period of six weeks, starting at discharge from the hospital.

Results: In total, we included 145 patients in the control group and 39 in the intervention group. At 6 weeks, the end of the intervention, the intervention group had significantly improved QoL in 5 of the 22 studied parameters. Only one of these five quality of life parameters remained significantly different at 12 weeks.

Conclusions: This study adds to the sparse evidence that telemedicine may be beneficial for the quality of life of cancer patients.