help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published January 28, 2003 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1259
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003;10(3):260-270
© 2003 American Medical Informatics Association


A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1259v1
10/3/260    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liederman, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morefield, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liederman, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morefield, C. S.

Submitted on September 26, 2002
Accepted on December 16, 2002

Web Messaging: A New Tool for Patient-Physician Communication

Eric M. Liederman MD, MPh1* and Catrina S. Morefield RD, MPh1

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Clinical Information Systems, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Objective There is a high demand by patients to communicate electronically with their doctor. This study evaluates the use of a Web messaging system by staff and patients of UC Davis community Primary Care Network (PCN) clinic.

Design Eight providers, their staff and patients were surveyed on use of this Web messaging system and physician productivity was measured with Relative Value Unit (RVU) and office visit data.

Results 36.9% (238/645) of registered users responded to the survey. The Web messaging system was preferred over phone calls by both providers and patients for the communication of non-urgent problems. A great majority of patients found it easy to use (88.8% or 206/232) and were satisfied (85.8% or 199/232). Satisfaction was significantly associated with timely provider response (Goodman-Kruskal Gamma=0.667, 95% CI=0.546 - 0.789). Clinicians were also favorable to the system and, despite concerns, were not inundated with messages. Most found it easy to use, perceived it to improve patient communication, and valued the insurance reimbursement capability. Furthermore, the system did not have a negative impact on physician productivity.

Conclusion A patient-provider Web messaging system, which provides a combination of security and access controls, customized routing, rich knowledge content and insurance reimbursement capability is a useful addition to the array of communication options available to healthcare providers and their patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. Levetown and and the Committee on Bioethics
Communicating With Children and Families: From Everyday Interactions to Skill in Conveying Distressing Information
Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1441 - e1460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. D. Ralston, D. Carrell, R. Reid, M. Anderson, M. Moran, and J. Hereford
Patient Web Services Integrated with a Shared Medical Record: Patient Use and Satisfaction
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 798 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. W. Arnold, A. A. T. Bui, C. Morioka, S. El-Saden, and H. Kangarloo
Informatics in Radiology: A Prototype Web-based Reporting System for Onsite-Offsite Clinician Communication
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1201 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. L. Grazi
Web Relationships Between Physicians and Individuals Seeking Information on Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases
Arch Surg, December 1, 2006; 141(12): 1176 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
G. Umefjord, K. Hamberg, H. Malker, and G. Petersson
The use of an Internet-based Ask the Doctor Service involving family physicians: evaluation by a web survey
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 159 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. S. Biermann, G. J. Golladay, and R. N. Peterson
Using the internet to enhance physician-patient communication.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2006; 14(3): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
P. C. Tang, J. S. Ash, D. W. Bates, J. M. Overhage, and D. Z. Sands
Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2006; 13(2): 121 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. D. Harris, J. C. McGregor, E. N. Perencevich, J. P. Furuno, J. Zhu, D. E. Peterson, and J. Finkelstein
The Use and Interpretation of Quasi-Experimental Studies in Medical Informatics
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 16 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. N. Weingart, D. Rind, Z. Tofias, and D. Z. Sands
Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 91 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. Shea, R. S. Weinstock, J. Starren, J. Teresi, W. Palmas, L. Field, P. Morin, R. Goland, R. E. Izquierdo, L. T. Wolff, et al.
A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 40 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
S. L. Leong, D. Gingrich, P. R. Lewis, D. T. Mauger, and J. H. George
Enhancing Doctor-Patient Communication Using Email: A Pilot Study
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2005; 18(3): 180 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. V. Slack
A 67-Year-Old Man Who e-Mails His Physician
JAMA, November 10, 2004; 292(18): 2255 - 2261.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. Hassol, J. M. Walker, D. Kidder, K. Rokita, D. Young, S. Pierdon, D. Deitz, S. Kuck, and E. Ortiz
Patient Experiences and Attitudes about Access to a Patient Electronic Health Care Record and Linked Web Messaging
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2004; 11(6): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
D. Z. Sands
Help for Physicians Contemplating Use of E-mail with Patients
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2004; 11(4): 268 - 269.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.