| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 14, 2003
Accepted on September 22, 2003
Affiliation of the authors: 1 VA Getting at Patient Safety Center of Inquiry, Cincinnati VAMC, The Ohio State University Institute for Ergonomics, Columbus, OH; 2 West LA VAMC; 3 Center for Quality Management, VA Public Health Strategic Health Care Group; 4 West LA VAMC; RAND
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Objective Substantial variations in adherence to guidelines for HIV care have been documented. To evaluate their effectiveness in improving quality of care, ten computerized clinical reminders (CRs) were implemented at two pilot and eight study sites. The aim of this study was to identify human factors barriers to the use of these CRs.
Design Observational study of CRs in use at eight outpatient clinics for one day each and semi-structured interviews with physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and case managers.
Measurements Detailed handwritten field notes of interpretations and actions using the CRs. Responses to interview questions.
Results Barriers present at more than one site were: 1) workload during patient visits (8/8 sites), 2) time to document when a CR was not clinically relevant (8/8 sites), 3) inapplicability of the CR due to context-specific reasons (9/26 patients), 4) limited training on how to use the CR software for rotating (5/8 sites) and permanent staff (3/8 sites), 5) perceived reduction of quality of provider-patient interaction (3/23 permanent staff), and 6) the decision to use paper forms to enable review of resident physician orders prior to order entry (2/8 sites).
Conclusion Six human factors barriers to the use of HIV CRs were identified. Reducing these barriers has the potential to increase use of the CRs and thereby improve the quality of HIV care.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Saleem, E. S. Patterson, L. Militello, S. Anders, M. Falciglia, J. A. Wissman, E. M. Roth, and S. M. Asch Impact of Clinical Reminder Redesign on Learnability, Efficiency, Usability, and Workload for Ambulatory Clinic Nurses J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 632 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Vishwanath and S. D. Scamurra Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model Health Informatics Journal, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 119 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Poon, J. L. Cina, W. Churchill, N. Patel, E. Featherstone, J. M. Rothschild, C. A. Keohane, A. D. Whittemore, D. W. Bates, and T. K. Gandhi Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med, September 19, 2006; 145(6): 426 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Sequist, T. K. Gandhi, A. S. Karson, J. M. Fiskio, D. Bugbee, M. Sperling, E. F. Cook, E. J. Orav, D. G. Fairchild, and D. W. Bates A Randomized Trial of Electronic Clinical Reminders to Improve Quality of Care for Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Saleem, E. S. Patterson, L. Militello, M. L. Render, G. Orshansky, and S. M. Asch Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Computerized Clinical Reminders J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 438 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |