help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published April 2, 2004 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1445
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004;11(4):260-267
© 2004 American Medical Informatics Association


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1445v1
11/4/260    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, S. J.

Submitted on August 26, 2003
Accepted on March 16, 2004

A Content Analysis of E-mail Communication Between Patients and their Providers: Patients Get the Message

Casey B. White1*, Cheryl A. Moyer MPH2, David T. Stern MD, PhD3, and Steven J. Katz MD, MPH4

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Office of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; 2 Global REACH (Research Education and Collaboration in Health), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; 3 Global REACH (Research Education and Collaboration in Health), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI; 4 Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Objective E-mail use in the clinical setting has been slow to diffuse for several reasons, including providers' concerns about patients' inappropriate and inefficient use of the technology. This study examines the content of a random sample of patient-physician e-mail messages to determine the validity of those concerns.

Design Qualitative analysis of patient-physician e-mail messages.

Measurements A total of 3007 patient-physician e-mail messages were collected over 11 months as part of a randomized controlled trial of a triage-based e-mail system in two primary care centers (including 98 physicians); 10% of messages were randomly selected for review. Messages were coded across such domains as message type, number of requests per e-mail, inclusion of sensitive content, necessity of a physician response, and message tone.

Results The majority (82.7%) of messages addressed a single issue. The most common message types included information updates to the physicians (41.4%), prescription renewals (24.2%), health questions (13.2%), questions about test results (10.9%), referrals (8.8%), other (including thank yous, apologies 8.8%), appointments (5.4%), requests for non-health-related information (4.8%), and billing questions (0.3%). Overall, messages were concise, formal, and medically-relevant. Very few (5.1%) included sensitive content, and none included urgent messages. Less than half (43.2%) required a physician response.

Conclusion A triage-based e-mail system promoted e-mail exchanges appropriate for primary care. Most patients adhered to guidelines aimed at focusing content, limiting the number of requests per message, and avoiding urgent requests or highly sensitive content. Thus, physicians' concerns about the content of patients' e-mails may be unwarranted.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. Rosen and C. K. Kwoh
Patient-Physician E-mail: An Opportunity to Transform Pediatric Health Care Delivery
Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): 701 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. L. Grazi
Web Relationships Between Physicians and Individuals Seeking Information on Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases
Arch Surg, December 1, 2006; 141(12): 1176 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
G. Umefjord, K. Hamberg, H. Malker, and G. Petersson
The use of an Internet-based Ask the Doctor Service involving family physicians: evaluation by a web survey
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 159 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. S. Biermann, G. J. Golladay, and R. N. Peterson
Using the internet to enhance physician-patient communication.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2006; 14(3): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. G. Anand, M. J. Feldman, D. S. Geller, A. Bisbee, and H. Bauchner
A Content Analysis of E-mail Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Parents
Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1283 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. V. Slack
A 67-Year-Old Man Who e-Mails His Physician
JAMA, November 10, 2004; 292(18): 2255 - 2261.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
H. Bauchner
Atoms
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 987 - 987.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
D. Z. Sands
Help for Physicians Contemplating Use of E-mail with Patients
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2004; 11(4): 268 - 269.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.