help button home button JAMIA Bigger figures
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published November 23, 2004 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M1598
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2005;12(2):172-180
© 2005 American Medical Informatics Association


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M1598v1
12/2/172    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rood, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zandstra, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rood, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zandstra, D. F.

Submitted on April 4, 2004
Accepted on November 12, 2004

Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the ICU improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation

Emmy Rood MSc1*, R. J. Bosman1, J. I. Van der Spoel1, P. Taylor2, and D. F. Zandstra1

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2 CHIME UCL, London, England

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Objective To measure the impact of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in an ICU.

Design A randomized, controlled trial with an off-on-off design.

Methods We implemented a glucose regulation guideline in an intensive care unit in paper form during the first study period. During the second period, the guideline was randomly applied in either paper or computerized form. In the third period the guideline was available only in paper form.

Measurements and Results We analyzed data for 484 patients. During the intervention period, the control group included 54 patients and the computerized intervention group included 66 patients. The two guideline-related outcome measures, consisted of compliance with: (a) glucose measurement timing recommendations, and (b) insulin dosage advice. We measured clinical impact as the proportion of time that glucose levels fell within target range. In the first (paper-based) study period, 29.0% of samples occurred with optimal timing; during the second period, this increased to 35.5% for paper-based and to 40.2% for computerized protocols. Third study period timeliness scores reverted to the first period rates. Late (sub-optimal) sampling occurred for 66% of glucose measurements in the first study period; for 42% of paper-based and 28% of computer-based protocol samples in the second period; and, for 50.0% of samples in the third study period In the first study period, insulin-dosing guideline compliance was 56.3%; in the second period, 64.2% for paper-based and 77.3% for computer-based protocols; and, it fell to 42.4% in the third period. For the second study period, the time that a patient's glucose values fell within target range improved for both the control (52.9%) and the computerized groups (54.2%) compared to the first study period (44.3%) and the third period (42.3%).

Conclusion Implementing a computerized version of a guideline significantly improved timeliness of measurements and glucose level regulation for critically ill patients compared with implementing a paper-based version of the guideline.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. O. Kooij, T. Klok, M. W. Hollmann, and J. E. Kal
Decision Support Increases Guideline Adherence for Prescribing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
M. J. Dortch, N. T. Mowery, A. Ozdas, L. Dossett, H. Cao, B. Collier, G. Holder, R. A. Miller, and A. K. May
A Computerized Insulin Infusion Titration Protocol Improves Glucose Control With Less Hypoglycemia Compared to a Manual Titration Protocol in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 18 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. G. Oeyen, E. A. Hoste, C. D. Roosens, J. M. Decruyenaere, and S. I. Blot
Adherence to and Efficacy and Safety of an Insulin Protocol in the Critically Ill: A Prospective Observational Study
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 599 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
T. Cohen, B. Blatter, C. Almeida, and V. L. Patel
Reevaluating Recovery: Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 312 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. B. Boord, M. Sharifi, R. A. Greevy, M. R. Griffin, V. K. Lee, T. A. Webb, M. E. May, L. R. Waitman, A. K. May, and R. A. Miller
Computer-based Insulin Infusion Protocol Improves Glycemia Control over Manual Protocol
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 278 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Wilson, J. Weinreb, and G. W. S. Hoo
Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critical Care: A review of 12 protocols
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2007; 30(4): 1005 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
W. F. Bria II
Applied medical informatics for the chest physician: information you can use!--Part 3.
Chest, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 1057 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.