| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 19, 2004
Accepted on August 12, 2005
Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD; 2 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; 3 Cereplex Inc., Germantown, MD
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Quasi-experimental study designs, often described as non-randomized, pre-post intervention studies, are common in the medical informatics literature. Yet little has been written about the benefits and limitations of the quasi-experimental approach as applied to informatics studies. This paper outlines a relative hierarchy and nomenclature of quasi-experimental study designs that is applicable to medical informatics intervention studies. In addition, we performed a systematic review of two medical informatics journals, the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA) and the International Journal of Medical Informatics (IJMI), to determine the number of quasi-experimental studies published and how the studies are classified on the above-mentioned relative hierarchy. We hope that future medical informatics studies will implement higher-level quasi-experimental study designs that yield more convincing evidence for causal links between medical informatics interventions and outcomes.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |