| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 18, 2005
Accepted on September 13, 2005
Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Health Systems Management, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA; 2 Center on Patient Safety, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Objectives The purpose of this study is threefold. First, we gather and synthesize the historic literature regarding electronic health record (EHR) adoption rates among physicians in small practices (10 or less members). Next, we construct models to project estimated future EHR adoption trends and timelines. Finally, we discuss the likelihood of achieving universal EHR adoption in the near future and articulate how barriers can be overcome in the small and solo practice medical environment.
Design This study utilizes EHR adoption data from six previous surveys of small practices to estimate historic market penetration rates. Applying technology diffusion theory, three future adoption scenarios - optimistic, `best estimate', and conservative - are empirically derived.
Measurement EHR adoption parameters - external and internal coefficients of influence - are estimated using Bass diffusion models.
Results All three EHR scenarios display the characteristic diffusion S-curve that is indicative that the technology is likely to achieve significant market penetration, given enough time. Under current conditions, EHR adoption will reach its maximum market share in 2024 in the small practice setting.
Conclusions The promise of improved care quality and cost control has prompted a call for universal EHR adoption by 2014. The EHR products now available are unlikely to achieve full diffusion in a critical market segment within the timeframe being targeted by policymakers.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Pakhomov, S. Bjornsen, P. Hanson, and S. Smith Quality Performance Measurement Using the Text of Electronic Medical Records Med Decis Making, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 462 - 470. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Brennan Standing in the shadows of theory. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2008; 15(2): 263 - 264. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V.S. Pakhomov, P. L. Hanson, S. S. Bjornsen, and S. A. Smith Automatic Classification of Foot Examination Findings Using Clinical Notes and Machine Learning J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2008; 15(2): 198 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Menachemi, E. W. Ford, L. M. Beitsch, and R. G. Brooks Incomplete EHR Adoption: Late Uptake of Patient Safety and Cost Control Functions American Journal of Medical Quality, October 1, 2007; 22(5): 319 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |