| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 29, 2005
Accepted on December 5, 2005
Affiliation of the authors: 1 Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA; 2 Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; 3 Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, MA; 4 Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN; 5 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Zix Corporation, Dallas, TX
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Recently there has been a remarkable upsurge in activity surrounding the adoption of personal health record (PHR) systems for patients and consumers. The biomedical literature does not yet adequately describe PHR systems' potential capabilities and utility. In addition, the lack of a proven business case for widespread deployment hinders PHR adoption. In a 2005 working symposium, the American Medical Informatics Association's College of Medical Informatics (the College) discussed the issues surrounding personal health record systems and developed recommendations for PHR-promoting activities. PHR systems are more than just static repositories for patient data; they combine data, knowledge, and software tools that help patients to become active participants in their own care. When PHRs are integrated with electronic health record systems, they provide greater benefits than would standalone systems for consumers. This paper summarizes the College Symposium discussions on PHR systems and provides definitions, system characteristics, technical architectures, benefits, barriers to adoption, and strategies for increasing adoption.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. Grant, J. S. Wald, J. L. Schnipper, T. K. Gandhi, E. G. Poon, E. J. Orav, D. H. Williams, L. A. Volk, and B. Middleton Practice-Linked Online Personal Health Records for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial Arch Intern Med, September 8, 2008; 168(16): 1776 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Kilbridge and D. C. Classen The Informatics Opportunities at the Intersection of Patient Safety and Clinical Informatics J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 397 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Berner Implementation Challenges for Clinical and Research Information Systems: Recommendations from the 2007 Winter Symposium of the American College of Medical Informatics J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 281 - 282. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Halamka, K. D. Mandl, and P. C. Tang Early Experiences with Personal Health Records J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Ralston, D. Carrell, R. Reid, M. Anderson, M. Moran, and J. Hereford Patient Web Services Integrated with a Shared Medical Record: Patient Use and Satisfaction J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 798 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Edited on behalf of the National Institute of Biom, C. P. Price, and L. J. Kricka Improving Healthcare Accessibility through Point-of-Care Technologies Clin. Chem., September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1665 - 1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pagliari, D. Detmer, and P. Singleton Potential of electronic personal health records BMJ, August 18, 2007; 335(7615): 330 - 333. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wright and D. F. Sittig Encryption Characteristics of Two USB-based Personal Health Record Devices J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 397 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |