help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published August 23, 2006 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2115
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13(6):608-618
© 2006 American Medical Informatics Association


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2115v1
13/6/608    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ancker, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Starren, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ancker, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Starren, J. B.

Submitted on March 30, 2006
Accepted on June 17, 2006

Design features of graphs in health risk communications: A systematic review

Jessica S. Ancker MPH1*, Yalini Senathirajah1, Rita Kukafka DrPH, MA2, and Justin B. Starren MD, PhD1

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY ; 2 Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

This review describes recent experimental and focus group research on graphics as a method of communication about quantitative health risks. Some of the studies discussed in this review assessed effect of graphs on quantitative reasoning, others assessed effects on behavior or behavioral intentions, and still others assessed viewers' likes and dislikes. Graphical features that improve the accuracy of quantitative reasoning appear to differ from the features most likely to alter behavior or intentions. For example, graphs that make part-to-whole relationships available visually may help people attend to the relationship between the numerator (the number of people affected by a hazard) and the denominator (the entire population at risk), whereas graphs that show only the numerator appear to inflate the perceived risk and may induce risk-averse behavior. Viewers often preferred design features such as visual simplicity and familiarity that were not associated with accurate quantitative judgments. Communicators should not assume that all graphics are more intuitive than text; many of the studies found that patients' interpretations of the graphics were dependent upon expertise or instruction. Potentially useful directions for continuing research include interactions with educational level and numeracy and successful ways to communicate uncertainty about risk.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Siegrist, P. Orlow, and C. Keller
The Effect of Graphical and Numerical Presentation of Hypothetical Prenatal Diagnosis Results on Risk Perception
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 567 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. S. Ancker and D. Kaufman
Rethinking Health Numeracy: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 713 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
I. M. Lipkus
Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 696 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.