help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published October 26, 2006 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2187
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14(1):110-117
© 2007 American Medical Informatics Association


A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2187v1
14/1/110    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D. W.

Submitted on June 24, 2006
Accepted on September 21, 2006

Correlates of Electronic Health Record Adoption in Office Practices: A Statewide Survey

Steven R. Simon MPH1*, Rainu Kaushal MD, MPH2, Paul D. Cleary PhD3, Chelsea A. Jenter MPH2, Lynn A. Volk MHS4, Eric G. Poon MD, MPH4, E. John Orav PhD2, Helen G. Lo5, Deborah H. Williams MHA6, and David W. Bates MD, MSc7

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA ; 2 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; 3 Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; 4 Clinical and Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Inc., Boston, MA ; 5 Clinical and Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Inc., Boston, MA; 6 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Briham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; 7 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Clinical and Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Inc., Boston, MA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Objective Despite emerging evidence that electronic health records (EHRs) can improve the efficiency and quality of medical care, most physicians in office practice in the United States do not currently use an EHR. We sought to measure the correlates of EHR adoption.

Design Mailed survey to a stratified random sample of all medical practices in Massachusetts in 2005, with one physician per practice randomly selected for survey.

Measurements EHR adoption rates.

Results The response rate was 71 percent (1345/1884). Overall, while 45 percent of physicians were using an EHR, EHRs were present in only 23 percent of practices. In multivariate analysis, practice size was strongly correlated with EHR adoption; 52 percent of practices with 7 or more physicians had an EHR, as compared with 14 percent of solo practices (adjusted odds ratio, 3.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.28 - 5.87). Hospital-based practices (adjusted odds ratio, 2.44; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.53 - 3.91) and practices that teach medical students or residents (adjusted odds ratio, 2.30; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.60 - 3.31) were more likely to have an EHR. The most frequently cited barriers to adoption were start-up financial costs (84 percent), ongoing financial costs (82 percent), and loss of productivity (81 percent).

Conclusions While almost half of physicians in Massachusetts are using an EHR, fewer than one in four practices in Massachusetts have adopted. Adoption rates are lower in smaller practices, those not affiliated with hospitals, and those that do not teach medical students or residents. Interventions to expand EHR use must address both financial and non-financial barriers, especially among smaller practices.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.