help button home button JAMIA Hate scrolling?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published January 9, 2007 as JAMIA PrePrint; doi:10.1197/jamia.M2195
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14(2):239-243
© 2007 American Medical Informatics Association


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
M2195v1
14/2/239    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collmann, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collmann, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, T.

Submitted on July 6, 2006
Accepted on October 29, 2006

Breaching the Security of the Kaiser Permanente Internet patient Portal: the Organizational Foundations of Information Security

Jeff R. Collmann PhD1* and Ted Cooper2

Affiliation of the authors: 1 Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; 2 Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

This case study describes and analyzes a breach of the confidentiality and integrity of personally identified health information (e.g. appointment details, answers to patient's questions, medical advice) for over 800 Kaiser Permanente (KP) members through KP Online, a web-enabled healthcare portal. The authors obtained and analyzed multiple types of qualitative data about this incident including interviews with KP staff, incident reports, root cause analyses, and media reports. Reasons at multiple levels account for the breach, including the architecture of the information system, the motivations of individual staff members, and differences among the subcultures of individual groups within as well as technical and social relations across the Kaiser IT program. None of these reasons could be classified, strictly speaking, as "security violations." This case study, thus, suggests that, to protect sensitive patient information, healthcare organizations should build safe organizational contexts for complex health information systems in addition to complying with good information security practice and regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) of 1996.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 1994 by the American Medical Informatics Association.